In message 
<08bfa5ada9462e4f96e4a31a270fc86b03b88...@usa0300ms02.na.xerox.net>, 
dated Wed, 28 Mar 2007, "Spencer, David H" <[email protected]> 
writes:

>Can anyone explain the immunity performance criteria  for (or the 
>rational behind) EN61326. 

It's probably the same principle as applied in EN 55103-2. Products are 
so diverse, and the applications of a particular product may vary 
widely, that any numerical immunity requirements would be useless.

>Unlike EN55024, which gives specific levels for a product, EN61326  
>Table 2 gives "examples" of how to apply the performance criteria.  
>Furthermore,  the manufacture must only provide the performance 
>criteria to the user upon request.  

Well, the user who is concerned about immunity should do just that. The 
provision is just to save the manufacturer sending out copies of the 
information that are just thrown away. If the information had always to 
be supplied, there would be pressure to minimize the amount. As it is, 
there is no reason why comprehensive information should not be supplied.

For this sort of product, the user is expected to be technically aware, 
and able to compare the immunity requirements in his/her particular 
application with the performance stated by the manufacturer.

Products to which IEC 61326 applies may be operated in all sorts of 
unusual, extreme and rare EMC environments.
> 
>The generic immunity standard is more stringent than this.

The Generics assume that the users are EMC-naive. It would clearly be 
wrong to assume otherwise.
> 
>A company could choose,  provided there is no damage to the product 
>during immunity testing and the emissions requirements are met, declare 
>compliance with EN61326.

It could. Whether anyone would buy it, it another matter.
-- 
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
There are benefits from being irrational - just ask the square root of 2.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas           [email protected]
     Mike Cantwell           [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
     David Heald:            [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to