Derek,

I like Ken Javor's method, very practical.

In regards to Luke Turnbull's method, I also used Excel, but slightly in a
different
process. I would scan in the graph in question as a jpeg or bitmap, and then
use
Paint (or something similar) so that I can get the x and y coordinates of the
pixel.
The pixels would be ones making the impedance values. I would take as many of
these
pixel x-y coordinates to replicate the graph. The x-y coordinates are then
calculated
to get the proper MHz and dB values. That's the short explanation.

Doing it this way is probably not the easiest, but it had the following
advantages-
- The scanned in graph need not be perfectly laid squared onto the glass when
scanning. It can be on an angle and the Excel program compensates for the
"angle".
- In comparing different graphs that are different in size and scale, this
helped in
making graph comparison easier. It is hard to visualize and get decent
accuracy when
graphs are in different sizes and scale factors.
- Having the graphs in an Excel spreadsheet, made it easier to store the
information
for later use.

I hope this helps.

Richard
2007 PSES Chair
2007 PSES Web site: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/symposium/
2007 PSES Symposium date: 22-23 October 2007

=====
Richard Georgerian
Compliance Engineer
email: [email protected]
=====

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas           [email protected]
     Mike Cantwell           [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
     David Heald:            [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to