In message <001701c7fe79$9d3bac20$154d4d0a@MmPc21>, dated Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Piotr Galka <[email protected]> writes:
>----- Original Message ----- From: "John Woodgate" ><[email protected]> >> >> This is an example of inexperienced drafting. Anyone with experience >>would know that a statement like '... indirectly by any means >>whatsoever...' is guaranteed to apply to ridiculous instances which >>could not possibly have been intended. >> -- > >Do you know any email address where I can ask the authors to explain >what they mean ? > > Unfortunately not; the Commission doesn't respond to such requests. You need to take the matter up through the Polish Government department that deals with the RTTE. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk There are benefits from being irrational - just ask the square root of 2. John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________
