Look at the loop:

GND-PLANE -- AE CM-impedance -- Clamp -- EUT CM impedance ---- GND-PLANE

It's a simple loop consisting of 2 resistors of 150 Ohm and a 10V (low
impedance) voltage
source in between.

If you look at the way the pre-set level for clamp testing is
calibrated,
you will notice that at the AE side  a 150 ohm CM resistance
to GND is used.  This creates 33 mA in a 2 x 150 Ohm = 300 ohm loop
impedance at 10 V EMF level setting.
That is the theoretical intended stress level.

If during a test the AE side is terminated with 0 Ohm CM impedance
instead 
of 150 Ohm, then the EUT current will be entirely
determined by the EUT impedance to ground.

IF the EUT has an standard 150 Ohms to ground then (10V)/150Ohm = 66 mA

If the AE-CM impedance is lower, then the current will be higher,
ultimately
Limited by the impedance of the ferrites at the AE side of the clamp.

If the AE side has infinite impedance to ground (what happens
if only the cable is put into the clamp without AE) then the current 
will be much lower, and any EUT will pass, making this test senseless.

It's important therefore, when testing using a clamp, that
the AE CM-impedance "closely" resembles 150 Ohm, using a CDN at the
supply (or other)
port of the AE. 

A clamp test can only be carried out if the AE side is impedance
controlled,
or the current to the EUT must be monitored all times.
(as mentioned in other replies to this post)

A clamp test cannot be carried out without an impedance at the AE side
Be it a CDN (making the clamp redundant) or be it a real AE, positioned
at
10 cm over ground plane AND at at least one cable terminated
With another type of CDN (possibly simpler.

While a CDN can be used without a connected AE side cable, the clamp
CANNOT, because
the current loop will be opened. If you don't not believe, draw the
current
Loops to prove it.

Gert Gremmen
Ce-test, qualified testing bv



Van: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Namens
[email protected]
Verzonden: maandag 17 september 2007 14:34
Aan: [email protected]
Onderwerp: Conducted RF immunity

When testing with EM clamp, the IEC/EN61000-4-6 gives a requirement
to not exceed Imax (e.g Imax = 10V / 150 ohm = 66mA).

We use a current clamp to measure on a 2-wire unscreened cable, and
it is placed between the EUT and EM clamp. The current is measured to
approximate 130mA.

The test lab say it is due to the EUT impedance that the current is
that high, I mean that the max current should not exceed 66mA
whatever the EUT impedance is.


How is this Imax requirement to understand?

Best regards
Amund Westin
Oslo, Norway

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas           [email protected]
     Mike Cantwell           [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
     David Heald:            [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas           [email protected]
     Mike Cantwell           [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
     David Heald:            [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to