Some brief history on OSHA and NRTL program.

http://www.osha.gov/dts/otpca/nrtl/nrtl/slide18.html

A bit more detail is at:  

http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20051800/edocket.access.gpo
.gov/2005/05-22630.htm (this link might wrap around in e-mail...go to
item B named "B. Why Did OSHA Develop the NRTL Program?")

Thanks,
Kaz
kazimier_gawrzy...@dell.com


From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Jim
Bacher
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 7:49 AM
To: David Lohbeck; emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: FCC Part 15 and U.S. Safety dates?

Dave, I am not sure when OSHA, NEC or others put it into place the
safety requirements, but I believe the NRTL program was started in the
area of late 1987 or early 1988. So the requirement for a product used
in the work place to have a safety certification would have had to been
in place by then. Below are a couple key items.


OSHA's rules say:
 
1910.155(c)(3)(iv)(B)

Equipment is labeled if there is attached to it a label, symbol, or
other identifying mark of a nationally recognized testing laboratory
which makes periodic inspections of the production of such equipment,
and whose labeling indicates compliance with nationally recognized
standards or tests to determine safe use in a specified manner;

1910.155(c)(3)(iv)(C)

Equipment is accepted if it has been inspected and found by a nationally
recognized testing laboratory to conform to specified plans or to
procedures of applicable codes; and

1910.155(c)(3)(iv)(D)

Equipment is certified if it has been tested and found by a nationally
recognized testing laboratory to meet nationally recognized standards or
to be safe for use in a specified manner or is of a kind whose
production is periodically inspected by a nationally recognized testing
laboratory, and if it bears a label, tag, or other record of
certification.

NEC says:

90-7.  Examination of Equipment for Safety.  For specific items of
equipment and materials referred to in this Code, examinations for
safety made under standard conditions will provide a basis for approval
where the record is made generally available through promulgation by
organizations properly equipped and qualified for experimental testing,
inspections of the run of goods at factories, and service-value
determination through field inspections.  This avoids the necessity for
repetition of examinations by different examiners, frequently with
inadequate facilities for such work, and the confusion that would result
>from conflicting reports as to the suitability of devices and materials
examined for a given purpose.
 
 
Oregon says:
479.610 Sale or disposal of uncertified or unevaluated electrical
product prohibited. Except as provided under ORS 479.540, no person
shall sell or dispose of by gift or otherwise in connection with the
person's business an electrical product that is not certified or
evaluated under the requirements of ORS 479.510 to 479.945. [1959c.406
s.9; 1981 c.815 s.12; 1995 c.706 s.2]

URL for the State of Oregon:
http://landru.leg.state.or.us/ors/479.html 


________________________________

 
Also, was there a date that a U.S. safety law WAS enacted and by who
(OSHA)?
 
Thanks,,
Dave Lohbeck

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas           emcp...@ptcnh.net
     Mike Cantwell           mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Jim Bacher:             j.bac...@ieee.org
     David Heald:            emc-p...@daveheald.com

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

______________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned by MCI Managed Email Content Service, using
Skeptic(tm) technology powered by MessageLabs. For more information on MCI's
Managed Email Content Service, visit http://www.mci.com.
______________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to