The origin of all this NRTL stuff...
 
http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp
show_document?p_table=DIRECTIVES&p_id=1839
 
 

Directives 
CSP 01-01-022 - STP 2-1.147A - Safety Testing or Certification of Certain
Workplace Equipment and Materials ... 
  _____  

 

 <http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owasr
h.search_form?p_doc_type=DIRECTIVES&p_t
c_level=0&p_keyvalue=&p_status=CURRENT> 
<http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owasrc
.search_form?p_doc_type=DIRECTIVES&p_toc_level=0&p_keyvalue=&p_status=CURRENT>
Directives - Table of Contents 
  _____  

 

• Record Type:
Instruction

• Directive Number:
CSP 01-01-022

• Old Directive Number:
STP 2-1.147A

• Title:
Safety Testing or Certification of Certain Workplace Equipment and Materials
...

• Information Date:
08/07/1989

• Standard Number:
 <http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owali
k.query_links?src_doc_type=DIRECTIVES&s
c_unique_file=STP_2-1_147A&src_anchor_name=1910.7> 1910.7
 

  _____  

 

OSHA Instruction STP 2-1.147A August 7, 1989 Office of State Programs 
Subject: Safety Testing or Certification of Certain Workplace Equipment and
Materials, 29 CFR 1910.7 et al 
A. Purpose. This instruction describes a Federal program change to the Regions
and State designees. 
B. Scope. This instruction applies OSHA-wide. 
C. Reference. OSHA Instruction STP 2-1.117, State Standards. 
D. Cancellation. OSHA Instruction STP 2-1.147, July 13, 1988, Safety Testing
or Certification of Certain Workplace Equipment and Materials, is canceled. 
E. Federal Program Change. This instruction describes a Federal program change
which affects State programs. Each Regional Administrator shall: 
1. Ensure that this instruction is forwarded to each State designee. 2.
Provide a copy of the Federal Register notice to the State designee upon
request. 3. Explain the technical content of the Federal Register notice at 53
FR 12102, April 12, 1988, as amended at 53 FR 16838, May 11, 1988, Safety
Testing or Certification of Certain Workplace Equipment and Materials; Final
Rule, to the State designee upon request. This final rule amends 23 standards
provisions in 29 CFR 1910 requiring employers to use materials or equipment
listed or approved by Underwriters Laboratories (UL) or Factory Mutual
Research Corporation (FMRC), and replaces this requirement with an obligation
to use equipment or materials listed or approved by a "nationally recognized
testing laboratory" (NRTL). The standard at 29 CFR 1910.7 also defines NRTL
and provides procedures whereby testing laboratories may obtain OSHA
recognition as NRTLs. 4. Ensure that each State designee acknowledges receipt
of this instruction in writing, within 30 days of notification, to the
Regional Administrator. 
OSHA Instruction STP 2-1.147A August 7, 1989 Office of State Programs 
The acknowledgment should include (a) the State's plan to adopt and implement
identical standards amendments, modified to clearly explain that the State
will not establish its own program for laboratory accreditation but will
instead use the Federal program; (b) the State's plan to adopt alternative
standards amendments which are as effective, including establishing an
independent State testing laboratory accreditation program, or (c) the reasons
why no change is necessary to maintain a program which is as effective. 5.
Explain that, because of the technical complexity involved in the recognition
process for testing laboratories and because one approval program with
nationwide applicability allows a more efficient use of resources, the States
are encouraged to adopt standards that rely on Nationally Recognized Testing
Laboratories accredited by Federal OSHA; i.e., where workplace equipment and
materials require safety certification or testing, the testing laboratory must
have received Federal OSHA recognition as an NRTL for that equipment or
material. States choosing to establish their own program for accrediting
testing laboratories may do so but must (1) accept accreditation by NRTL's
recognized by OSHA for testing of equipment and materials where State safety
requirements are the same as the Federal; (2) assure that organizations
receiving State accreditation understand that State recognition applies only
within that State; and (3) establish an at least as effective program,
including site inspections of the facilities of the testing laboratory, etc.
No 23(g) or State matching funds may be used for the establishment or
operation of State testing laboratory accreditation programs. 6. Inform each
State designee that the State must amend its standards to ensure that they
remain at least as effective as the Federal standards actions modifying the 23
Federal standards in 29 CFR 1910 by requiring safety certification or testing
by an OSHA-approved NRTL. Where a State decides to establish an independent
State testing 
2
OSHA Instruction STP 2-1.147A August 7, 1983 Office of State Programs 
laboratory accreditation program for different State equipment and materials
requirements with in-State applicability and enforcement, the State must adopt
a standard at least as effective as the Federal 1910.7. Appropriate plan
supplements must be submitted within 6 months of the date of Federal
publication. 7. Inform each State designee that States which have adopted a
standard prior to the issuance of this amended instruction should review and
revise their standard as appropriate or issue necessary clarifying policy
documents to assure that State requirements for certification of certain
equipment and materials and recognition of testing laboratories reflect the
State's intent to either accept only Nationally Recognized Testing
Laboratories approved by Federal OSHA or establish an independent State
program. Such amendments/clarifications must be submitted as part of the plan
supplement. 
F. Effective date. The effective date of these standards amendments is June
13, 1988. 
G. Interim Enforcement. Under 29 CFR 1953.23(a) and (b), State plan States are
provided up to 6 months from publication of the Federal standard in the
Federal Register to promulgate an identical or at least as effective standard.
If a State, for whatever reason, is unable to promulgate a standard in a
timely manner (6 months for a permanent standard, 30 days for an emergency
temporary standard) the State shall be expected to provide assurance that it
will enforce the substantive provisions of the new or revised Federal standard
through such means as use of its general duty clause or equivalent, temporary
adoption of an identical standard, or an alternative, specified enforcement
mechanism. 
H. Different State Standards. Section 18(c) (2) of the OSH Act requires that
State standards be at least as effective as the Federal and, when applicable
to products used or distributed in interstate commerce, be required by
compelling local conditions and not unduly burden interstate commerce. In
addition to the at least as 
3
OSHA Instruction STP 2-1.147A August 7, 1983 Office of State Programs 
effective criterion, this "product clause test" will be applied to State
standards with substantively different requirements from the comparable
Federal standards, as discussed in OSHA Instruction STP 2-1.117. 
I. Explanation. 1. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
deleted the names of Underwriters Laboratories, Inc. (UL) and Factory Mutual
Research Corporation (FMRC) from 23 testing-related standards provisions in 29
CFR Part 1910. 
2. Under these standards, third-party (or independent) testing for safety is
necessary in order that certain equipment and materials be acceptable for
workplace use. The safety standards being revised either had explicitly
required or had implied that this safety testing be performed only by UL or
FMRC. For a period of five years beginning June 13, 1988 and ending on June
13, 1993, UL and FMRC are recognized testing laboratories though their
recognition by OSHA is subject to revocation at any time. At the end of the
five year period, the UL and FMRC must apply for renewal of OSHA recognition
utilizing the procedures established in the standard 3. As a result of this 
UL/FMRC name deletion, the 23 identified OSHA safety standards now will
provide that certain types of workplace equipment and materials be third-party
tested for safety by "nationally recognized testing laboratories (NRTL)." 4.
The final rule includes a requirement that testing laboratories listing or
approving products or equipment required to be approved, listed or labeled
under Part 1910 be recognized as Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratories by
OSHA. Under the section 1910.7 rule OSHA will evaluate applicant testing and
control programs against the NRTL requirements, and issue a written
"recognition" letter. This will be done in accordance with a new Appendix A
which is part of this rule 
4
OSHA Instruction STP 2-1.147A August 7, 1989 Office of State Programs 
and provides for Federal Register notice and comment. OSHA contemplates
continuing surveillance over OSHA-recognized NRTLs to assure conformance with
requirements of the rule. 5. Several testing laboratories have applied to OSHA
for accredition as NRTL's. States are encouraged to participate in the
accreditation process by responding to Federal Register notices concerning
these applicants with comments. 6. Some States have existing testing
laboratory programs that are not necessarily part of their occupational safety
and health program. If, in response to OSHA's new laboratory accreditation
program, these States choose to incorporate their testing laboratory programs
into their State plan, or if States establish new testing laboratory
accreditation programs, no 23(g) or State matching funds may be used for the
development or operation of these programs as they would duplicate a complex
technical process already available Federally. 7. Under 29 CFR 1953.23(a) and
(b), States are provided up to 6 months from publication in the Federal
Register for adoption of parallel State standards and amendments. 
Alan C. McMillan Acting Assistant Secretary 
DISTRIBUTION: National and Regional Offices 18(b) State Monitors State
Designees 


[email protected] wrote:

With thanks to one of our subscribers, I find that
my quote from OSHA 1910.399, 2004, does not exist
in today's 1910.399.

My earlier message quoted from the definition of
"approved for the purpose." This definition seemed
to allow any "organization concerned with product
evaluation" to determine that the equipment was
suitable for the purpose.

When I go to today's OSHA web page for 1910.399, I 
find that "approved for the purpose" no longer is 
in the list of definitions. 

So, I stand corrected. The law has no provision for
the employer, as an organization, to, independently, 
determine the safety of electrical equipment.

The only option is "Acceptable," definition 3. This 
requires testing by the equipment manufacturer and 
requires the test data to be kept by the employer. 
See:


http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=STANDARDS&p_id
=9976

You can read all of the OSHA electrical regulations
at this web site:


http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=STANDARDS&p_id
=10135

I apologize for my mistake.


Best regards,
Rich

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

Scott Douglas [email protected]
Mike Cantwell [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

Jim Bacher: [email protected]
David Heald: [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc





- Bill
You can say what you want about the South, but you never hear of anyone
retiring and moving North!!!


  _____  

Looking for last minute shopping deals? 
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51734/*http
//tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping> Find them
fast with Yahoo! Search. - ------------
--------------------------------------------------- This message is from the
IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] 


Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 


List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 


For help, send mail to the list administrators: 


Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] 


For policy questions, send mail to: 


Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] 


All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 


http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc


Reply via email to