In message <ofe8a46d00.7b962aff-on8625790c.0059e33c-8625790c.005a6...@mmm.com>, dated Thu, 15 Sep 2011, [email protected] writes:
>"Commercial equipment" is not specifically called out in CISPR 22 but >in one paragraph it talks about using "actual equipment" as >peripherals. I take "actual" to mean the stuff that the user would be >using even though the word does not specifically mean "commercially >available". Very sensible, because the actual equipment to be connected might be custom stuff, and the EUT needs to pass with that stuff, not with something else. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK When I point to a star, please look at the star, not my finger. The star will be more interesting. - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
