In message <ca8140fd.bec28%[email protected]>, dated Mon, 29 
Aug 2011, Ken Javor <[email protected]> writes:

>To my knowledge, there has been no confusion about this topic since 
>1993.

We are noticing this in other standards areas. 18 years on, most of the 
people have changed, and what was agreed and why is becoming unknown. 
This is one reason why I have taken steps to put 'preservation orders' 
(called 'stabilized status') on legacy IEC TC100 standards. Other 
standards committees could, with advantage, follow suit.

In SC77A, we actually wrote a history - IEC 61000-1-4 - so that 'why' 
would not be forgotten.
-- 
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
When I point to a star, please look at the star, not my finger. The star will
be more interesting.

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to