I tried to get a Notified Body opinion on this issue today, but I have to try
again next week.

So far, I support the suggestion of both marks on the label.

 

Br.

Amund

 

Fra: Lauren Crane [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sendt: 10. juni 2011 22:50
Til: [email protected]
Emne: Re: [PSES] CE marking conflict

 

Good point, John. If two separate markets are foreseen for the part, both
directives (and possibly others, depending on what the part is) may be
applicable. 

In that case, I can't imagine it would be a problem to mark one component with
both marks (i.e., for both markets) provided the single part could indeed be
made that conforms to both set of criteria. 
-- 
Lauren Crane (mr.) 
Product Regulatory Analyst | Corporate Product EHS | Applied Materials 
Office 512.272.6540 | Mobile 512.736.7201 | America - Europe - Asia 

-external use- 

** Save paper and trees! Please consider the environment before printing this
e-mail. 




From:        "John  Cotman" <[email protected]> 
To:        <[email protected]> 
List-Post: [email protected]
Date:        06/10/2011 10:45 AM 
Subject:        RE: [PSES] CE marking conflict 
Sent by:        [email protected] 

________________________________




If I understand Lauren’s reply, he is correctly pointing out that a product
cannot simultaneously fall within the scope of the Marine Equipment and ATEX
Directives, by virtue of the ATEX exclusion he quotes. 
  
In the case that it’s always used in a seagoing vessel etc, only the MED
marking would be appropriate.  Maybe what is envisaged is a device with more
than one potential use, one sea-going, the other not?  In that case, dual
marking would be the right answer. 
  
John C 
  

 

________________________________


From: Lauren Crane [mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> ] 
Sent: 10 June 2011 15:48
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PSES] CE marking conflict 
  
Unless there are clauses in either directive that say otherwise, use both
marks. I am not aware of anything in ATEX that contra-indicates the Wheel
Mark. 

Note that the ATEX directive may drive other marking in additional to "CE"
depending on the particulars of a component under consideration. 

But even more importantly, note the following ATEX exclusions 

The following are excluded from the scope of this Directive: 
— medical devices intended for use in a medical environment, 
— equipment and protective systems where the explosion hazard 
results exclusively from the presence of explosive substances or 
unstable chemical substances, 
— equipment intended for use in domestic and non-commercial environments 
where potentially explosive atmospheres may only rarely 
be created, solely as a result of the accidental leakage of fuel gas, 
— personal protective equipment covered by Directive 89/686/EEC (1), 
— seagoing vessels and mobile offshore units together with equipment 
on board such vessels or units, 
— means of transport, i.e. vehicles and their trailers intended solely for 
transporting passengers by air or by road, rail or water networks, as 
well as means of transport in so far as such means are designed for 
transporting goods by air, by public road or rail networks or by 
water. Vehicles intended for use in a potentially explosive atmosphere 
shall not be excluded, 
— the equipment covered by Article 223 (1) (b) of the Treaty. 
-- 
Lauren Crane (mr.) 
Product Regulatory Analyst | Corporate Product EHS | Applied Materials 
Office 512.272.6540 | Mobile 512.736.7201 | America - Europe - Asia 

-external use- 

** Save paper and trees! Please consider the environment before printing this
e-mail. 




From:        "Amund Westin" <[email protected]> 
To:        <[email protected]> 
List-Post: [email protected]
Date:        06/10/2011 08:04 AM 
Subject:        CE marking conflict 
Sent by:        [email protected] 

 

________________________________





A product under Marine Equipment Directive shall be marked with the
Wheel-mark. 
A product under ATEX Directive shall be marked with the ”CE” mark. 
 
If a product is coved by both directives, shall both marks be in use? 
 
Mvh Amund 
  

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]> 

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]> 

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]> 

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]> 

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]> 


Reply via email to