"Proving harmful interference isn't hard, really, just some credible
recordings and witnesses. The hard part is getting the FCC to accept a
complaint and act on it."

Amen.
Several of us at different times have tried to report offending products to
the commission.  The most offensive product I have tried to report lately was
a LED lighting product that jams FM radio.  
-Doug

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Cortland
Richmond
Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2011 6:08 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Part 15 doesn't test for interference [was: dow for new standards]

Preventing interference is first a duty of the user, then of the seller who
"knew or should have known etc" then of the manufacturer, who must not only
meet Part 15's requirements -- but KEEP meeting them. A Part 15 product I
helped get approved some 20 years ago at a former employer was fairly
recently the subject of a Commission action, and if my guess is correct,
someone probably removed a piece of copper tape we'd added to reduce its
field strength. Another example might be consent agreements these past five
or ten years WRT widely retailed SMPS-based car and gel-cell battery
chargers.

Part 15 strongly implies a manufacturer's duty to follow up:
 
Section 15.15 General technical requirements.
(c) Parties responsible for equipment compliance should note that the
limits specified in this Part
will not prevent harmful interference under all circumstances. Since the
operators of Part 15 devices are
required to cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized
users of the radio frequency
spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged
to employ the minimum field
strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of
unwanted emissions than
required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve
harmful interference problems
(for example, see Section 15.105(b)). 

Proving harmful interference isn't hard, really, just some credible
recordings and witnesses. The hard part is getting the FCC to accept a
complaint and act on it.

Ask ARRL's Ed Hare.  


Cortland 
KA5S

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to