Just for clarification,

 

Cell phones with GSM technology transmit with 2W burst power @ 850MHz and with
1W burst power @1900 MHz

CDMA and WCDMA technology uses 200mW output power.

 

Regarding the influence of cell phones to a human being. My opinion is, that
there are millions of cell phones used for so many years by a huge number of
people and many of them seem to have the phone glued to the ear.

If there is any impact we should have seen a significant increase in certain
areas like cancer. This didn’t happen therefore I believe the influence is
close to none. 

Best Regards

Lothar Schmidt
Director Regulatory & Antenna Services

CETECOM Inc. 
411 Dixon Landing Road
Milpitas, CA 95035

Phone +1 (408) 586 6214
Fax       +1 (408) 586 6299
email    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  

This e-mail may contain proprietary, privileged and confidential information
for the sole use of the named intended recipient.  Any review or distribution
of this e-mail by any party other than the intended recipient or that person's
agent is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
delete all copies and immediately contact the sender. You must not, directly
or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this
message if you are not the intended recipient.

 

________________________________

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Fred Townsend
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 11:37 AM
To: Tang, George
Cc: Derek Walton; IEEE EMC Discussion Group
Subject: Re: Another Cancer Scare?

 

George, I'm no medical expert either but I think I understand a few laws of
physics, Gauss's law, and Maxwell's equations in particular. If there is to be
any effect on the human body, surely it must be directly from the magnetism or
indirectly from the induced currents. To the best of my knowledge there never
has been a demonstrated effect on the human body by magnetism. That leaves
induced currents. 

Many ham and commercial handy talkies (HT) can put out 5 watts. When used, the
rubber ducky runs right by the face or ears. From personal experiments I can
say looking directly at the sun causes a noticeable heating effect while using
my 5 watt HT @ 146MHz at night doesn't. The skin effect (not to be confused
with human skin) means that almost none of the energy penetrates the skull at
146 MHz. If it doesn't penetrate, how can it cause an effect?

As you point out modern cell phones put out much less power (<100 mW). Since
the skin effect is much greater at cell phone frequencies, I don't think there
is a snowball's chance of a cell phone causing damage to any part of the body
with the possible exception of the eyes.  There is anecdotal evidence that
looking at a functional cell phone while driving can cause injury and even
death to the whole body.

Fred Townsend
DC to Light

Tang, George wrote: 

My personal opinion is that the research findings MAY have some valid points,
however, the data they have is way out-dated.  We know that in the late '80s,
people use mobile phones that put out several watts of radiated power.  In the
early '90s when cell phones were just starting to appear on the market, most
of them were still putting out more than 1 watt of radiated power.  We have
heard of technicians who worked on LAN equipment while talking on the cell
phone, and the cell phone radiation induced data error in the Ethernet lines. 
Those were the days when the cell phone transmitted too much power.  In the
last few years, the goal of achieving longer talk time, thus lower power
consumption, and the use of low voltage electronics due to the widely
incorporation of sub-micron transistors have limited the cell phone
transmitted power down to low mW range.  The research is so far behind the
improvements in technology tha
t their findings are out-dated by the ne
 
w products on the market today.  Of course, I am not a medical expert in the
cancer field, and I do not design or manufacture cell phones, so I certainly
cannot speak for the experts in these areas.  But I do know that these
findings most likely are not applicable to the products out on the market
today.
 
George Tang
 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Fred Townsend
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 12:09 PM
To: Derek Walton
Cc: IEEE EMC Discussion Group
Subject: Re: Another Cancer Scare?
 
I heard the interview. The doctor appeared to dodge the question as to
proof.  He did say more research was needed (Ignoring this subject has
already been extensively researched.).  It appeared to be a blatant
attempt to get research funding.
 
Fred Townsend
DC to Light
 
Derek Walton wrote:
 
  

        Does anyone know more about the research spoken about in the BBC news
        artical?
         
        http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7523109.stm
         
        Is it really new unpublisged research or just rehashing the old?
         
        Sincerely,
         
        Derek Walton L F Research
         
        -
        ----------------------------------------------------------------
        This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
        emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
         
        To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]
         
        Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
         
        List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
         
        For help, send mail to the list administrators:
         
            Scott Douglas           [email protected]
            Mike Cantwell           [email protected]
         
        For policy questions, send mail to:
         
            Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
            David Heald:            [email protected]
         
        All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
         
           http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
         
            

 
-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
 
To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]
 
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
 
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
 
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 
     Scott Douglas           [email protected]
     Mike Cantwell           [email protected]
 
For policy questions, send mail to:
 
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
     David Heald:            [email protected]
 
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
 
    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
 
  

 

- ---------------------------------------------------------------- This
message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] 

Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators: 

Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] 

For policy questions, send mail to: 

Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] 

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 

http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc -
---------------------------------------------------------------- This message
is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] 

Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators: 

Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] 

For policy questions, send mail to: 

Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] 

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 

http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc 

Reply via email to