This isn’t about solving problems, it is about hunting witches. Throughout
history it has always been easier to hunt witches than solve the problems the
witches were supposed to have caused.  But the original witch hunters had it
easier than those today; they focused on an unequivocal fact like a bad
harvest or a run of bad luck, then cast about to find someone to blame it on.
The witch hunters today can’t get away with that, so they (mis)use
statistics to “prove” the witch is guilty.

Our Founding Fathers wisely and with great foresight required that the decadal
national census be measured, not aided by predictive statistics, for the very
same reason the last Democrat administration sought to evade that restriction
– it is easy to color statistical outcomes the shade you desire.  Maybe we
ought to have a similar restriction on any legal activity relative to
statistics.  You can use statistics to to get a clue about a process, but you
have to have a non-statistical definitive mechanism explaining the process
before you take legal action or pass laws. So for instance your physician
could advise you to stop smoking based on the large number of smokers with
lung cancer and the small number of nonsmokers with lung cancer, but until the
precise causal link between smoking and lung cancer was proven, you could not
legally restrict smoking, let alone sue the tobacco industry.
 
Ken Javor

Phone: (256) 650-5261



________________________________

From: "Pettit, Ghery" <[email protected]>
List-Post: [email protected]
List-Post: [email protected]
List-Post: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 14:09:14 -0700
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Gert Gremmen
<[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Conversation: Another Cancer Scare?
Subject: RE: Another Cancer Scare?

An awful lot of discussion about something that may or may not happen.  If we
put this much energy into finding a way to prevent prostate cancer (which will
affect 1 in 6 men) it would be a more useful endeavor.  But, I guess that
doesn’t sell newspapers.
 
Ghery Pettit
 
 


________________________________

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Fred Townsend
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 2:05 PM
To: Gert Gremmen
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Another Cancer Scare?

This discussion may be delayed but I suspect it will go on for a long time. 

What next cell phones as a weapon? Opps, sorry they are already used in IEDs. 
How about long range popcorn popping? 
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_Denial_System. 

If this will give you a headache, surely the lawsuits for brain cancer can't
be far away.

Fred Townsend
DC to Light

Gert Gremmen wrote: 
To end this discussion (??!??), my opinion about this subject:
 
EM fields of different frequencies and power levels will probably impact our
body.
So does eating salt, fat food, driving cars and talking loud. Reading
email is probably harmful to your eyes. Mains harmonics will cause
induced currents in your body; doctors and physicians will sooner or later
day prove a correlation between  cancer and cell phones. The same correlation
they found between eating meat and cancer, and between most of the actions of
life
and cancer. 
 
I think most of these correlations are within the noise margins of risk and
life.
Each factor exists and is true, but is small compared to the total risk, and
even more important, removing one source of cancer risk won’t reduce the
total risk.
(like summing 100 noise sources, and removing one)
 
Annihilating all sources of cancer is impossible, and we have to live with the
fact that now and then one of us is to die early because of cancer.
We live on a dangerous  planet, radiated by damaging sun radiation, dangerous
natural radio-activity, stress causing partners and children to live with, and
all kinds of small  risks of dangerous nature.
 
If you cannot live with the risk of  cancer from your cellular, stop crossing
roads and
driving cars, flying planes and eating at MacDonald’s.  Stop living.
 
If there were a substantial risk on cancer by exposure to EM-waves, this would
have been
proven without doubt a long time ago. Like happened for radio-activity.
The “inventor” of radio-activity (M. Curie) died of it. 
Like the substantial risks caused by exposure for certain  chemicals and
cancer. 
 
Wise design incorporates reducing any source of energy impacting the human
body, for numerous reasons, not just cancer. Low power transmitters allow for
longer standby time, and smaller batteries, reducing environmental impact and
increasing
quality of the product, as well as lower costs, and yes , preventing costly
investigations that have been done over and over, trying to quantify a
neglectable effect.
 
 
 
Gert Gremmen
 
 

Van: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Namens Tang, George
Verzonden: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 9:19 PM
Aan: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
Onderwerp: RE: Another Cancer Scare?

Thank you.  
 
George 
 
 


________________________________

From: dBaron [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 12:00 PM
To: Tang, George; 'Monrad Monsen'
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Another Cancer Scare?

Sir:
 
The intermittent, registration communications between a mobile phone and its
base station are milliseconds in duration at intervals of 5-10 minutes;
minimal exposures.
 
Regards,
 
Dave Baron, PE
Consulting Engineer
Electromagnetic Field Safety
Austin, TX 
Voice: 512 917-8346
Fax: 206 203-0605
 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tang, George
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 1:53 PM
To: Monrad Monsen; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Another Cancer Scare?

This is very good information.  But has any one done any study on the effects
(if any) of cell phone fields on body internal organs?  We know that cell
phones make intermittent communications with cell towers even when they are
not in use.  Therefore, by simply carrying the cell phone with us, we are
already exposed to the cell phone transmitting energy.  Thus, it really does
not matter if we are making long calls or short calls – we are being
radiated 24 hours a day by just wearing the cell phone on the body.  
 
Thanks for addressing this.  
 
George Tang 
 
 


________________________________

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Monrad Monsen
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 7:18 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Another Cancer Scare?

This has been an interesting discussion.  There is definitely a lot of
interest in this subject. 

Our EMC chapter in Denver heard a talk on this subject from an EMC Society
Distinguished Lecturer (Dr. Michel Ianoz) on July 26, 2004.  This presentation
addressed the subject of "Biological and Health Effects of Electromagnetic
Fields" in a very organized and detailed manner using three approaches:
  * Calculation and measurement (engineers)
  * Biological effects (biologists and engineers)
  * Effects on health (medical doctors and statisticians)

I was impressed with the variety of approaches that have been used to study
the topic.  He concluded that more studies needed to be done, but basically
the health risk is at such a low level that it is difficult to evaluate. This
contrasts greatly from the clear health risks of heavy smoking.  But we should
be concerned when we see that moss growth and other biological organisms are
affected when exposed to electromagnetic energy.  Certainly, the power limits
and restrictions used today greatly reduce this concern. I have no problems
using cell phones next to my ear for short calls, but I prefer to use an ear
bud or the speaker phone function for longer calls to keep the phone farther
>from my brain.

By going to our chapter web site, you can see the record of the meeting
(http://www.ewh.ieee.org/r5/denver/rock
mountainemc/archive/2004/July/index.html) and the actual slides he presented
(http://www.ewh.ieee.org/r5/denver/rock
mountainemc/archive/2004/July/bioeffect.pdf).

Enjoy!

Monrad Monsen
Chairman, Rocky Mountain Chapter of EMC Society (RMCEMC) of IEEE

-- 
Monrad L. Monsen
Compliance Program Manager
Storage Group
Sun Microsystems
[email protected]
303.272.9612 Office
 
- ---------------------------------------------------------------- This
message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 
To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] 

Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators: 

Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] 

For policy questions, send mail to: 

Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] 

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 

http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc-
---------------------------------------------------------------- This message
is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] 

Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators: 

Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] 

For policy questions, send mail to: 

Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] 

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 

http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc 

- ---------------------------------------------------------------- This
message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 
To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] 

Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators: 

Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] 

For policy questions, send mail to: 

Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] 

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 

http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc 

- ---------------------------------------------------------------- This
message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 
To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] 

Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators: 

Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] 

For policy questions, send mail to: 

Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] 

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 

http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc 


- ---------------------------------------------------------------- This
message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 
To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] 

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators: 

 Scott Douglas           [email protected] Mike Cantwell          
[email protected] 

For policy questions, send mail to: 

 Jim Bacher:             [email protected] David Heald:           
[email protected] 

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 

 http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc-
---------------------------------------------------------------- This message
is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. 
  Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] 

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators: 

 Scott Douglas           [email protected] Mike Cantwell          
[email protected] 

For policy questions, send mail to: 

 Jim Bacher:             [email protected] David Heald:           
[email protected] 

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 

 http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

- ---------------------------------------------------------------- This
message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] 

Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators: 

Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] 

For policy questions, send mail to: 

Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] 

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 

http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc 

Reply via email to