Ed is correct. The antenna factor of the 95010-1 is 8 dB/m when  
configured for MIL-STD-461 RE02/RE102.  I was talking about the  
amplifier gain, not the complete antenna.  BTW, one of my two 95010-1  
antennas came from the UK. The "bloke" from whom I bought it shipped  
it with four dead dry cell type batteries - I paid to ship those dead  
batteries across the pond, plus they can break loose easily under  
stress and then damage the circuit board. I was lucky and only paid  
the penalty of the high shipping costs; the antenna worked flawlessly  
with good batteries.



Quoting "Price, Edward" <[email protected]>:

>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>  From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> Julian Jones
>  Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 3:36 AM
>  To: [email protected]
>  Subject: monopole recommendations
>
>
>  we need to get a back up for our EMCO 3301, 41 inch rod antenna.
>
>
>  looking for recommendations for what other labs are using. I've
> noted the changes MIL 461F brings with grounding the connector
> especially.
>
>  I've almost finalised on the A H systems SAS-550-1B has anyone
> got / used this one ? any problems to report.
>
>  Rgds
>
>
>
>  Julian Jones
>  Hursley EMC Services
>  Tel:   023 8027 1111
>  Mob: 07787 523 607
>
>  [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>  Unit 16, Brickfield Lane
>  Chandlers Ford
>  EASTLEIGH, Hampshire, SO53 4DP
>  Company Registration 3301279
>
>
>
> Julian:
>
> I have been using an SAS-550-1B for about ten years, and I like it quite
> a bit. It has an internal battery that gives about 8 hours operation,
> almost as long as the venerable old Stoddart 95010-1. The gain flatness
> isn't a smooth as the Stoddart, but the sensitivity is a little bit
> better (mine averages about -11.3 dB AF; I don't know if that's typical
> or I'm just lucky). (Ken Javor mentions the 0 dB factor, but that was
> available only when you used the capacitive top-hat and extended the rod
> to about 50"; so when a standard calls for a 41" rod, active or passive,
> the old Stoddart could only give you a flat 8 dB antenna factor.) The
> slightly non-flat AF is no problem with modern acquisition systems; if
> your software can handle the wiggly factor of a biconical, the active
> rod will seem almost flat in comparison.
>
> A couple of years ago, I had AHS modify my active rod to allow me the
> ability to have an active loop antenna. They changed the top connector
> to a type N, added a switch on the side to select rod or loop, and added
> some circuitry inside the amplifier box. I can now connect either their
> 41" rod or 12" loop to the amplifier base. This is a good bargain if you
> need to do both electric & magnetic fields.
>
> Reliability has been excellent. Battery life is long enough that I don't
> have to worry about external power. It is ESD sensitive, so no touching
> the exposed rod element!
>
> Ed Price
> [email protected] <blocked::mailto:[email protected]>      WB6WSN
> NARTE Certified EMC Engineer & Technician
> Electromagnetic Compatibility Lab
> Cubic Defense Applications
> San Diego, CA  USA
> 858-505-2780 (Voice)
> 858-505-1583 (FAX)
> Military & Avionics EMC Is Our Specialty
>
> -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
> emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
>
> To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]
>
> Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
>
> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
>
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>
>      Scott Douglas           [email protected]
>      Mike Cantwell           [email protected]
>
> For policy questions, send mail to:
>
>      Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
>      David Heald:            [email protected]
>
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
>
>     http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
>

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas           [email protected]
     Mike Cantwell           [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
     David Heald:            [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc




Reply via email to