In message <of955c9238.a21e24d2-on8025751c.0050d01f-8025751c.00526...@selex-comms.co m>, dated Thu, 11 Dec 2008, [email protected] writes:
>What arguments does/has anyone used to convince senior management (who >are requiring 'built standard' info to be included on the DoC), that >this is not the right course to take, bearing in mind that 'built >standard' information is already included in the relevant assessment >reports / Technical File, that support the DoC? It's very difficult to understand why anyone would want to put the 'built standard' on the DoC. You could be producing a new DoC every few days, and putting in place a procedure that ensures that every shipment goes out with the correct version. It's not required by the Directive. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk Either we are causing global warming, in which case we may be able to stop it, or natural variation is causing it, and we probably can't stop it. You choose! John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
