Electromagnetic Compliance will probably never get much attention in
education.  However, that isn’t necessarily due to a perceived lack of
importance.  A good program will provide classes based on the needs of the
industries that will hire the graduates.  The requirements of industry are
extremely broad and there is only so much that can be crammed into most four
year programs.  Specialty fields, such as EMC and product safety will get
little or no attention in most programs.  The typical baccalaureate program
(at least within the United States) is limited to four years and must cover
significant breadth of material.  Prospective engineers can learn the basics
needed, such as electromagnetic field theory, but the details of EMC typically
must be learned on the job.  I have worked for companies that specialize in a
number of areas not covered in a typical four year education.  I found that my
college education gave me a good basis on which to start my job, but there was
still a lot to learn.  

 

In my first job, I worked for a company that designed industrial electronics
and I had to learn the finer points of analog circuit design.  My education
covered the basics of operational amplifiers, but I never had formal training
on 4-20mA circuits, user interface design, worst case analysis or many other
topics necessary for industrial electronic design.  My first introduction into
susceptibility testing came in this job where poorly designed analog circuits
didn’t work in noisy industrial environments.  In this case, regulation
didn’t drive the need for good EMC design, market forced did.  In a recent
job, I had to learn a lot about power distribution methods and issues.  I had
one course in power distribution in college which taught me the basics of
three-phase circuit analysis, but I still had a lot to learn.  Knowledge of
electrical codes became essential for me to do the job, and these were never
mentioned in my basic education.

 

Most aspects of my career, including but not limited to EMC and product
safety, have required me to find experts and apprentice myself to them. 
Should we consider making graduate level education mandatory for engineers? 
Should engineers have to work in rotations in different specialties the way
prospective doctors do?  What percentage of engineers end up as EMC engineers?
 If it is less than 5%, would we even expect more than a few universities to
offer specialized programs in the field?  

 

One final thought is that a lot of people go into engineering to design
things.  In general, EMC engineers are not designing new products.  (Although
we find that we must know good design in order to fix or redesign products
that fail EMC testing.)  I would not have chosen to go into the field of
testing when I came out of high school and I doubt many prospective
engineering students would enter a full program on EMC.

 

Ted Eckert

Compliance Engineer

Microsoft Corporation

[email protected]

 

The opinions expressed are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of my
employer.

 

 

 

 

From: Price, Edward [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 7:49 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: EMC Eduction and Training

 

         

________________________________

        From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kunde, 
Brian
        Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 6:52 AM
        To: EMC-PSTC
        Subject: RE: EMC Eduction and Training

        Hey, lets think about this for a minute.  Do we really want this “black
magic” stuff we do for a living to be better taught in universities?  Lets
face it, we have a good thing going here and we don’t need some greenhorn
engineer thinking he knows more about it than we do.  As mentioned earlier,
this job is more experience and technique than science.

          

        The best EMC engineers and technicians I know where not taught in 
school, but
had been mentored by an older experienced EMC engineer.  Like a magician
passing on his secretes to his apprentice. This is how it has been done and
the way it has to be done.  

         

         

        The Other Brian 

         

         

The Other Brian touches on an interesting and salient feature of the happy EMC
Engineer. EMC demands a more "hands on" approach than most of the other
disciplines. Those students who are not already building their own circuits
and frying their own power supplies will not do well in EMC, or at minimum,
will try to stay toward the academic / computational edge of EMC. To the
rigidly academic, it must be terrifying to discover that EMC problems have so
many unknowns and (usually) more than one solution.

 

I'm not so sure that a mentoring / apprentice system HAS to be the only way to
assure continuity, but, from my observation, it has been an effective and
efficient method. Certainly, we could get into an endless discussion of
whether our educational system rationally assigns talent to appropriate needs
(after all, they told me I could be anything I wanted; what they didn't tell
me was that what I wanted also had to be needed). Remember Pachinko and
Pinball machines? There's something fascinating about watching the life-arc of
a ball, despite us knowing with 6-sigma certainty the origin and destination
of every ball.

 

Uhhh, what was the question?

 

 

Ed Price

[email protected] <blocked::mailto:[email protected]>      WB6WSN

NARTE Certified EMC Engineer

Electromagnetic Compatibility Lab

Cubic Defense Applications

San Diego, CA  USA

858-505-2780

Military & Avionics EMC Is Our Specialty

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]> 

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]> 


Reply via email to