John
 
I would recommend that you start with IEC60721 Series and use that to define
your environment and from that derive your test regime. That standard allows
you to define the severity of each aspect of the environment rather than use a
single generic definition that may not be completely accurate for your
particular situation. You can thus take into account whatever environmental
protection the equipment may have (or not).
 
Best regards
 

Neil Barker

Manager

Central Quality

 

e2v

106 Waterhouse Lane, Chelmsford, Essex, CM1 2QU, England

Tel:         +44 (0)1245 453616

Mobile:   +44 (0)7801 723735

Fax:        +44 (0)1245 453571

 www.e2v.com <http://www.e2v.com/> 

 

P Consider the environment: do you really need to print this e mail?

 


________________________________

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John Harrington
Sent: 17 December 2008 21:16
To: [email protected]
Subject: 



Hi Group

 

Does anyone have any recommendations for environmental test standards
(vibration,, shock, temp, humidity etc) for sensitive test and measurement
equipment that will be transported around a lot.

 

We normally use MIL-PRF-28800F but my manager has decided that this isn’t
severe enough and has sent me off to look for something else.  The only other
standard I have familiarity with is NEBS GR-63 and I don’t think he would
want to go that far!

 

Thanks

 

John Harrington

Compliance Engineer

Keithley Instruments, Inc.

[email protected]

Tel: 440 498 2727

 


_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs. For
more information please visit http://www.ers.ibm.com
_____________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________
-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]> 


Sent by E2V TECHNOLOGIES PLC or a member of the E2V group of companies. 
A company registered in England and Wales. 
Company number; 04439718. 
Registered address; 106 Waterhouse Lane, Chelmsford, Essex, CM1 2QU, UK.

______________________________________________________
________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]> 


Reply via email to