Tim, I know that this has been an issue in Taiwan in the past - I had a submission rejected a few years ago for this reason. I'll defer to someone with more recent experience with Korea since the regulating agencies just changed there - the last approval I completed there was at my last job just before the change occurred (now I'm realizing that I haven't sought approval for a non radio device for a long time in Korea so there's another reason to defer to someone else). As for 1-4, for most devices, you're dealing with self-declaration or its equivalent. This is up to you to determine if your results indicate compliance in a 10m chamber since a 10m chamber is the common reference indicated in most emissions standards. Taking the assumption you state into account, you should be in good condition. It would be a good idea to obtain some correllational data to a 10m chamber to confirm you're getting similar results (and use some engineering judgement in the near field). This is a short response to a complex issue, but I hope it was somewhat helpful. Best Regards, -Dave
________________________________ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 5:39 PM To: [email protected] Subject: 5 Meter Chamber For EMI Qualification Testing Hello Group, I would like to know if radiated emission test data taken at a 3 meter distance in a 5 meter semi-anechoic chamber is valid for qualification testing for the following: Please assume that the chamber is fully validated with volumetric NSA. 1. FCC/Industry Canada 2. VCCI (Japan) 3. Australia/New Zealand 4. Europe 5. Taiwan 6. Korea I ask this question because I have been hearing that some countries do not accept 3 meter chamber data. Thanks for your help. Tim Pierce ________________________________ New year...new news. Be the first to know what is making headlines <http://www.aol.com/?ncid=emlcntaolcom00000026> . - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher <[email protected]> David Heald <[email protected]> ------------------------- This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this e-mail or any attachment is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please contact the sender and delete all copies. Thank you for your cooperation - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher <[email protected]> David Heald <[email protected]>
