IEC 60950-1 section 4.7.3.2 contains the following paragraph:

Materials for components that fill an opening in a FIRE ENCLOSURE, and that are 
intended to be
mounted in this opening shall:
− be of V-1 CLASS MATERIAL; or
− pass the tests of Clause A.2; or
− comply with the flammability requirements of the relevant IEC component 
standard.

Seems ok to require most of the fire enclosure to be 5V with small sections of 
V1 allowed, but the above has no size restriction, which seems odd to me.  Does 
anyone know if this is the subject of a CTL decision or any other 
“official” interpretation?  

I’ve seen UL and CSA standards with similar easements but there’s a 
dimensional cap (for example openings no more than 1” (25.4mm) in any 
dimension).

Thanks,

Jim Eichner, P.Eng.
Compliance Engineering Manager
Xantrex Technology Inc.
e-mail: [email protected]
web: www.xantrex.com 

Any opinions expressed are those of my invisible friend. 

Confidentiality Notice: This email message, including any attachments, is for 
the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and 
privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or 
distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please 
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original 
message.

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>


Reply via email to