In message <9C95CBECF5824ABC89E24537A48C3182@PC323541548743>, dated Wed, 21 Jan 2009, [email protected] writes:
>It takes a lot of time and effort to read >the cert report and request changes. Who >benefits from making those changes? Not every test house is 100% diligent or accurate. And we know that different interpretations of a standard can lurk in the minds of individual test persons for a long time before surfacing. So, unless you have used a test house for some time, and know quite well the person who supervised or did the tests, then some check is advisable. I was involved with such a case, where the (well-known) test house interpreted IEC 60065 incorrectly, and this resulted in a clarifying amendment. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk Things can always get better. But that's not the only option. John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
