<MASTER RANT> ROTFLMAO -> "...perceived inconsistency..." and "The environmental benefit of the clarification of this scope is uncertain...."
< fifth-grade grammar teacher shouting with nasal tone > People, people - can I have some science and engineering herrrreeee ? < end nasal tone > Could someone please explain why the definition, use, treatment, and life-cycle of ALL 'bad' stuff is not hamrmonized in a single directive -- a la RoHS-REACH-WEEE-etc Directive ? </MASTER RANT> and yes, I have been writing an XML parser... From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Powell, Doug Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 11:43 AM To: EMC-PSTC ([email protected]) Subject: RoHS and CE marking - proposals and implications Hello all, http://ec.europa.eu/governance/impact/docs/ia_2008/sec_2008_2930_ en.pdf http://www.ipc.org/ImaginePub/RoHS-revision-implications.asp Imminent or too soon to tell? -doug - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
