Ron,
There are a few minor changes, but the major points are a significant clean-up of Annex A, updating the dated references to the latest version (as of when the CDV was circulated last year) and the deletion of the 4% step size option for conducted and radiated RF immunity. The deletion of the 4% step size option was due to a decision handed down at the CISPR meetings in Osaka in 2008. A decision which has been overruled by a higher authority. Unfortunately, after the CDV was voted, so we can’t arbitrarily put it back in. Once the 2nd Edition is published we will start work on Amendment 1 which will fix a problem in the new Annex A that was noted by a national committee in the voting on the CDV and which will put the 4% step sizes back in the standard. CISPR 35 is still very much in development. There is an NP out for vote which has the text of what is, for all practical purposed, the 3rd CD for CISPR 35. The national committees are being asked to vote on the NP (do we continue the work?) and whether they feel that the text included with the NP is ready to go out as a CDV. Ghery S. Pettit Convenor, CISPR SC I WG3 (CISPR 22 and 24 work) Member, CISPR SC I WG4 (CISPR 35 work) From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Ron Pickard Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2010 11:31 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: CISPR 24 Ed. 2 ? To those knowledgeable with CISPR 24 Ed. 2 development, I just received notice that CISPR 24 Ed. 2 FDIS has been released for sale while being voted on (voting period: 2010-06-11 to 2010-08-13). This came as a bit of a surprise to me in that CISPR 35 was on the distant horizon to replace CISPR 24. >From this, I have a couple of questions. - What are the expectations of the final voting result? - What changes/requirements does Ed. 2 present over Ed. 1, or does it only incorporate Ed.1 and its amendments? - When would the national committees be anticipated to adopt/incorporate CISPR 24 Ed.2 into national standards/requirements (adept crystal ball viewing allowed)? - Is CISPR 35 development now in limbo? I’m sure that others in the group would also want to be updated. I look forward to your replies. Best regards, Ron - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <emcp...@socal.rr.com> Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher <j.bac...@ieee.org> David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com> - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <emcp...@socal.rr.com> Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher <j.bac...@ieee.org> David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com>
