Hello  Friends, Collegues,

 

Thanks to all of you for help,

comforting words en correcting some

misconceptions on my side.

 

My conclusions are:

 

·         Nothing wrong with my analyser, -71 dBm is quite normal

·         I need more gain and less losses into cabling (the latter had
already my attention before with immunity testing)

·         More gain into more efficient antenna’s (= lower antenna factors)

·         More gain = Have a “better” pre-amp, instead of 24 dB, I might
need 45 or 50 dB of gain and where possible, less noise

·         Limits have been over specified in some cases

 

To illustrate this last point, manufacturer has come up with relaxed
requirements after I mentioned that 

the noise exceeded the limit lines.

 

As a last question:

 

How can I predict the noise floor from the analysers specification (-154dBm at
10H

 

Regards,

Ing. Gert Gremmen

 

 

 

[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 

www.cetest.nl


Kiotoweg 363

3047 BG Rotterdam

T 31(0)104152426
F 31(0)104154953

 

 Before printing, think about the environment. 

 

 

Van: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Namens Cortland Richmond
Verzonden: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 12:56 PM
Aan: [email protected]
Onderwerp: RE: Radiated emission testing for automotive at low levels.

 

Good day, Gert.

 

The straightforward answer is an antenna with enough gain to provide the
margin needed for a valid test.  Gain required can be reduced by using lower
loss coax and up-front preamplification.  Add 8 dB antenna gain, cut cable
loss in half, and add a low-noise preamp with 10 dB gain at the antenna (or
any equivalent combination).  i have recently seen that done with good results.

 

 In a "previous life" I brought my 800-1000 MHz noise floor down with a much
better coax cable, but that was for a 10 meter OATS. Then I had to either
switch to the internal preselector or add attenuation because the "usual
8447D" was overloaded by ambients.  My supervisor and co-workers were not
comfortable with these measures, which didn't last long, however and that
company no longer exists. But I digress.

 

More gain, less loss.

 

 

Cortland Richmond

KA5S

 

        ----- Original Message ----- 

        From: ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
<mailto:[email protected]>  

        To: [email protected]

        Sent: 5/25/2010 3:17:45 PM 

        Subject: Radiated emission testing for automotive at low levels.

         

        Colleagues and friends,

         

        I have recently been asked to quote testing for automotive

        car manufacturers ESA specifications.

        Part of the specification is very low level testing,

         as low as 20 dBuv/m at 120 Khz BW above 1 Gig.

         

        Can any of you shine their lights/contribute 2 cents

        on the test configuration needed for that.

        I have run into the following problem:

         

        Our R&S analyzer has a noise floor at 120 kHz bandwidth

        of approximately -71 dBm. Adding a 6 dB preamplifier noise and 24 dB

        gain lowers the noise floor to

        89 dBm (18 dBuV). Our horn antenna (3115) has a AF of >20 dB (@1m)

        and the resulting noise level field strength is about >38 dBuV/m

         

        What is your choice in solving this problem ?

         

        Gert Gremmen

         

         

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]> 

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]> 


Reply via email to