If you transmit the rf energy through sub-space that will solve the exposure
problem.

 

Yea, my electric tooth brush has an inductively coupled battery charger. Very
nice design because there are no contacts to corrode and go bad. 

 

You would think that efficiency would be improved if you could use a frequency
and antenna system that would transfer the energy in a focused narrow beam,
such as microwave or laser.  That would help the exposure problem as well,
unless you stood in the wrong place. Ouch!

 

The Other Brian

 

________________________________

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dan Roman
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 9:50 AM
To: Price, Edward; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Wireless Power Transmission

 

Ed,

 

I saw the same article.  I agree, it wouldn’t meet the FCC exposure limits
for transmitters/antennas either.  What about conducted and radiated limits!?!
 BPL is having trouble, now power through air?  I can see inductively charging
batteries at a close distance and I actually have a gadget or two that does
that.  The ability to put coils in the walls of a house and be able to put a
wireless lamp anywhere in the room you like, while a neat idea, seems just too
impractical to bother considering.

 

Dan

 

From: Price, Edward [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 9:26 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [PSES] Wireless Power Transmission

 

I recently read a follow-up on wireless transmission of energy. Back maybe as
long as last year, there was a burst of publicity about a prof at MIT(?) who
had created a demonstrator of energy transfer. The demo showed about a 1
square meter, several turn, flat coil transmit and a similar receive antenna;
the separation distance was also about a meter. The receive and transmit
antennas had parallel tuning capacitors, and the receive antenna drove a 40
Watt incandescent lamp (not clear if the lamp was in series or parallel with
the capacitor).

 

OK, the point is that I was surprised to see transmission of 40 Watts over a
meter. At the time, the tech details were slim, but the follow-up points out
that the operational frequency of this demo was 10 MHz! And the efficiency was
somewhere around 10%. Of course, the prof wasn’t claiming anything about
efficiency, he just wanted to show the transfer demonstration.

 

My immediate reaction is that he was pumping out maybe a half kW at 10 MHz!
Didn’t anybody notice that the room felt strangely warm, and that some
digital cameras did strange things? My second reaction was that 10 MHz is an
internationally protected frequency (no emissions allowed at all, to protect
time-standard signals). He might at least move on over to 13.56 MHz.

 

In any case, all these schemes about wireless power transmission seem to crash
on the shores of acceptable human exposure. Remember those wild schemes from
the 60’s, where huge orbital solar arrays would convert sunlight to
microwave, and then beam it back to Earth? Maybe that’s where the concept of
aluminum foil hats originated!

 

 

Ed Price

[email protected] <blocked::mailto:[email protected]>      WB6WSN

NARTE Certified EMC Engineer

Electromagnetic Compatibility Lab

Cubic Defense Applications

San Diego, CA  USA

858-505-2780

Military & Avionics EMC Is Our Specialty

 

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]> 

_________________________ 

LECO Corporation Notice: This communication may contain confidential
information intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you received this by
mistake, please destroy it and notify us of the error. Thank you. 
-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]> 

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]> 


Reply via email to