All issues were addressed to the satisfaction of the audience. And the reason that I practiced on both my cat and my dog was because the intended audience was composed of both scientists and engineers.
> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of John > Woodgate > Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 1:44 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [PSES] IEEE PSES 2010 Call For Papers > > > In message <[email protected]>, > dated Tue, > 13 Apr 2010, Brian O'Connell <[email protected]> writes: > > >I once practiced a presentation on my cat and dog until they were > >fascinated and listened with rapt attention. And neither > requested any > >money. > > But did you answer their technical questions to their satisfaction? > -- > OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk > John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK > I should be disillusioned, but it's not worth the effort. - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
