Scott - I would agree with John - press your case with them or take the
business elsewhere. There's nothing to say they HAVE to be tested to the
same standard, bottom line is you (the customer) are seeking to prove
presumption of conformity to a suitable safety standard applicable to
the item. If having them tested to different standards satisfies your
needs then they should comply.

If the speaker system is powered by an EPS does it require testing at
all?

Chris


From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Scott
Douglas
Sent: 03 December 2009 05:43
To: 'EMC PSTC'
Subject: IEC 60065 vs IEC 60950-1

There is a product that is a speaker system. It could be connected to a 
computer and be considered ITE. It can also connect to other audio 
sources that are not computers and so could be considered AV. The 
primary market target is not computers, but other devices. The product 
is powered by an External Power Supply (EPS).

The EPS is already approved to IEC/EN/UL 60950-1 (ITE). A safety agency 
was asked to test the product to IEC/EN/UL 60065 (AV). The agency said 
the EPS and product should be tested to the same standards in order to 
be consistent. If they test the product to the AV standard, they say 
they will treat the EPS as an unapproved component, implying they will 
do all the extra testing normally done for an EPS. But if they test the 
product to the ITE standard, then they do not need to test the EPS at
all.

UL 60065 makes allowances to accept a power supply  tested under UL 
60950-1. I do not find these same allowances directly within IEC/EN
60065.

My comment was that the product should be tested without regard for the 
EPS provided the EPS is a Class II LPS supply (it is). And the test 
reports for the product should just say that the product is required to 
be provided with or to use a Class II LPS supply.

Is there anything in IEC/EN 60065 that permits or prevents using a 
IEC/EN/UL 60950-1 EPS with the product? Or that would require such an 
EPS to be treated as an unapproved component? Any suggestions on what to

tell the safety agency?

Thank you for your comments.

Scott Douglas

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your
e-mail to <[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that
URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to