15 MANUFACTURING DEVIATION and DRIFT
15.1 Those parts of controls providing a TYPE 2 ACTION shall have adequate
consistency of manufacture
with regard to their declared OPERATING VALUE, OPERATING TIME, or
OPERATING SEQUENCE.
In some countries, MANUFACTURING DEVIATION and DRIFT are expressed as
separate tolerances to the declared OPERATING VALUE. For some
controls with TYPE 2 ACTION, allowable values of MANUFACTURING DEVIATION
and DRIFT are specified. The consistency is then determined,
using prescribed apparatus, by measurement of the OPERATING VALUE of the
sample and comparison to the declared OPERATING VALUE.
15.1DV D2 Modification of 15.1 by adding the following text after the
note:
The 2in some countries2 clause is applicable in the USA.
15.2 Compliance is checked by the appropriate tests of this clause.
15.3 For those controls which are completely or partially destroyed during
their normal OPERATION, the tests
of the appropriate subclauses of clause 17 are deemed to be sufficient.
15.4 For those controls which are dependent on the method of mounting on,
or incorporation in an
equipment for their OPERATION the MANUFACTURING DEVIATION and the DRIFT
shall be declared separately and be
comparative values. The declared MANUFACTURING DEVIATION should be
expressed as a bandwidth or spread
(for example 10 K) and the DRIFT by an alteration of value (for example ?
10 K or + 5 K, - 10 K)
15.5 The consistency shall be determined as follows:
15.5.1 Test apparatus used shall be such that the control is mounted in
the manner declared by the
manufacturer.
15.5.2 For SENSING CONTROLS the apparatus shall preferably be such that
the normal OPERATION of the control
is used to control the apparatus.
15.5.3 However, because this test is made to determine comparative values
rather than RESPONSE VALUES,
the form of the apparatus is not critical. It should, however, simulate as
nearly as is practicable the
conditions of service.
15.5.4 The electrical conditions of the test shall normally be VR max and
IR max unless different conditions
have been declared in requirement 41 of table 7.2.
However, the OPERATION of the control shall be sensed by a suitable device
with a sensing current not
exceeding 0,05 A.
15.5.5 For SENSING


17 Endurance
17.1 General requirements
17.1.1 Controls, including those submitted in or with an equipment, shall
withstand the mechanical,
electrical and thermal stresses that occur in NORMAL USE.
17.1.2 Controls with TYPE 2 ACTIONS shall operate such that any OPERATING
VALUE, OPERATING TIME or OPERATING
SEQUENCE does not change by an amount greater than the declared DRIFT.
17.1.2.1 Compliance with 17.1.1 and 17.1.2 is checked by the tests of
17.1.3 as indicated in 17.16.
17.1.3 Test Sequence and Conditions
17.1.3.1 In general, the sequence of tests is:
- an ageing test specified in 17.6 (This test applies only to those
actions classified as Type 1.M
or 2.M);
- an overvoltage test of AUTOMATIC ACTION at accelerated rate specified in
17.7. (In some countries
this test is replaced by an overload test);
- a test of AUTOMATIC ACTION at accelerated rate specified in 17.8;
- a test of AUTOMATIC ACTION at slow rate specified in 17.9. (this test
applies only to SLOW-MAKE,
SLOW-BREAK AUTOMATIC ACTIONS);
- an overvoltage test of MANUAL ACTION at accelerated speed specified in
17.10. (in some
countries this test is replaced by an overload test);
- a test of MANUAL ACTION at slow speed specified in 17.11;
- a test of MANUAL ACTION at high speed specified in 17.12. (this test
applies only to actions with
more than one pole, and where polarity reversal occurs during the
OPERATION);
- a test of MANUAL ACTION at accelerated speed specified in 17.13.


 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Kunde,
Brian
Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 8:37 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: PTC Test Requirements

According to IEC/EN 60950 section 2.5b, a positive temperature coefficient
device (PTC) can be used to limit current for a limited power source
circuit.
 
It says the PTC has to "pass the test specified in IEC 60730-1, clauses
15, 17, J.15 and J.17".  I don't have this standard. Can someone outline
the test requirements for me? I'm trying to avoid adding another standard
to our library unless we really need to.
 
Application:  Sometimes we would like to supply 24Vdc to an I/O port to
operate a device outside the fire enclosure. I assume a PTC or Pico Fuse
can be used for this application. We drive the I/O circuit with a
programmable High-Side Driver programmed to 4 amps max but someone
suggested that we cannot rely on it for safety in this application. Any
other suggestions?
 
Thanks to all,
The Other Brian

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to