The protective earth conductor should be considered associated with the source
of power for which the protection is needed. For example in a rack or other
assembly of products you may have more than one power cord and the need is to
provide earthing for the metal surfaces likely to encounter faults to the
source of power associated with that earth.
It is less important within products but in building wiring it is important
for the neutral and earth conductors to be closely associated (run with) with
the other power conductors to minimize impedances, particularly inductive
barriers like going through separate holes in steel enclosures, which would
interfere with overcurrent operation during faults.
Products may have protective earths associated with other power sources, for
example leakage from multiple telephone lines, as mentioned in IEC 60950 Cl
6.1.2.2.

Bob Johnson
ITE Safety <http://www.itesafety.com> 

American Idle wrote: 

        What if you have two or more power cords (redundant power supplies, for
example)? Then I would think that you can say you have multiple protective
conductors, even if only one is required/used.
        
        
        On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Richard Nute <[email protected]> wrote:
        

                Hi Doug:
                
                
                Your equipment has only ONE protective conductor (in the
                power cord).  That one conductor connects the equipment to the 
external
earth.  
                Within your equipment, the point of origin to which the 
protective conductor
in the power cord is connected is the PROTECTIVE CONDUCTOR TERMINAL.  Since
there is only one protective conductor in the power cord, there can be only one
                PROTECTIVE CONDUCTOR TERMINAL.
                
                Internally, you may connect one or more PROTECTIVE BONDING 
CONDUCTORS (used
to internally connect other parts to earth) to the PROTECTIVE CONDUCTOR
TERMINAL.
                
                There are some constructional rules for doing this.
                
                
                Best regards,
                Rich
                
                
                
                
                
                ----- Original Message ----- From: "Doug Kramer" 
<[email protected]>
                To: <[email protected]>
                Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 9:58 AM
                Subject: Protective Conductor Question 



                In IEC 61010-1:2001 paragraph 6.5.1.2 b) it states "The integral
                protective conductor connection of an appliance inlet shall be 
regarded
                as the PROTECTIVE CONDUCTOR TERMINAL".  Are there any cases 
where the
                protective conductor connection can be elsewhere when an IEC 
appliance
                inlet with ground is used?  Can there be more than one 
protective
                conductor terminal?
                
                
                
                Thanks,
                
                
                
                Doug Kramer
                
                
                
                -
                ----------------------------------------------------------------
                
                This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering 
Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]> 


                All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
                http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
                Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be 
posted to that URL.
                
                Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
                Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
                List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
                
                For help, send mail to the list administrators:
                
                Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
                Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
                
                
                For policy questions, send mail to:
                
                Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
                David Heald: <[email protected]>
                


        -
        ----------------------------------------------------------------
        This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society 
emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>
        
        All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
        Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to 
that URL. 

        Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
        Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
        List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

        For help, send mail to the list administrators:
        Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
        Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 

        For policy questions, send mail to:
        Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
        David Heald <[email protected]> 

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]> 


Reply via email to