Good People,

I am attempting to reduce instrument calibration cost/time for non-EMC related
equipment.

THe proposed process has the calibration contractor perform calibration of a
set of 'master instruments' (so are directly traceable to NIST), and other
instruments are internally verified using the 'masters'. The proposed process
lists a hierarchy of instrument accuracy and precision, and specifies the
ranges and scales for each verification of each instrument. 

Uncertainty is addressed, but GUM is not used. A verification is performed on
a subset of the instrument's parameter set. IEC17025 mentions 'vaildated
methods' and does not disallow this process; and neither is there anything
that specifically recognizes this type of calibration system. My two basic
premises are that the measurement uncertainty from a verification is logged at
regular intervals, and the process will comply with the requirements list in
5.4.4.

I am audited by three agencies and two agree, in principle, with the proposed
process. The third does not concur. FWIW, my certificates have a narrow scope
- most define of list of Type Tests for several product safety standards.

Calibration is distant from my education and experience - so I would
appreciate critical thoughts on the use of this as a process internal to a
company lab.

thanks much,
Brian 

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to