Brian:
There is indeed an FCC logo that is used on products approved using the Declaration of Conformity assessment procedures (see Part 18.209(b)). The FCC Identifier is used for products that are certified (see Part 2.925). If you have approved a device using the verification procedure there should NOT be anything resembling an FCC logo or FCC identifier that might make someone think that it was approved using the Doc or certification procedures associated with those labeling requirements.. Under Part 18 I don’t think there is any specific information required on the product (unlike Part 15 which has requirements for specific label and user-manual statements) other than some means of identifying the product and who is responsible for it. As for the CISPR 11 labeling, I remember seeing on a piece of rf test equipment “Group 1 Class A”, so I am sure you could use a similar approach. I don’t think there would be any issue in having “Class A” listed on the label alongside the product info required by the FCC. Mark Our products are FCC Part 18 Verification Class A. On the FCC website for labeling, it says: §2.954 Devices subject only to verification shall be uniquely identified by the person responsible for marketing or importing the equipment within the United States: It goes on to say, A uniquely identified label shall not be of a format which could be confused with the FCC Identifier (FCC ID) required on certified equipment or the Declaration of Conformity label. The importer or manufacturer shall maintain adequate identification records to facilitate positive identification for each verified device. What does that mean? Is there a label or Logo for Part 18 Class A products? Can I have a label with the FCC Logo with the text “Part 18 Class A Verification”? Would that meet the requirements? If not, how to I label my products to show they comply to the FCC requirements? In addition, the CISPR11 standard requires Class A equipment to be labeled somehow to note the fact that it is a Class A product and not Class B. How should this be done and can it be combined with the FCC label to meet both requirements? Thanks to all. The Other Brian _________________________ LECO Corporation Notice: This communication may contain confidential information intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you received this by mistake, please destroy it and notify us of the error. Thank you. - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher <[email protected]> David Heald <[email protected]> - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher <[email protected]> David Heald <[email protected]>
