Perhaps the requirements for a Class 2 source will reduce the size of this
loophole. Note that 6V x 8A = 48W. Not enough to charge a battery and run a
multi-core processor; but probably more than enough for a 'netbook'.

So the bean counters will have determine if the extra cost of
construction/materials for a non-limited source (Class I, >100VA, >8A) will
still be better than buying a smart and efficient power supply.

Brian 

 > -----Original Message-----
 > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Piotr
 > Galka
 > Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 2:36 AM
 > To: EMC-PSTC; Scott Xe
 > Subject: Re: EuP Directive Conundrum
 > 
 > 
 > Scott,
 > 
 > I suppose shortly all notebooks will be equipped with 6V 
 > power supplies and 
 > 1275/2008 will not apply.
 > The other subject is that it is probably less energy 
 > effective solution than 
 > using higher voltage, but it looks that Commission likes 6V.
 > 
 > Piotr Galka
 > 
 > 
 > ----- Original Message ----- 
 > From: "Scott Xe" <[email protected]>
 > To: "'Brian O'Connell'" <[email protected]>; "'EMC PSTC'" 
 > <[email protected]>
 > Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 6:21 PM
 > Subject: RE: EuP Directive Conundrum
 > 
 > 
 > > Brian,
 > >
 > > A typical example would be notebook computer.  It uses EPS 
 > that must 
 > > comply
 > > the IM for EPS and the whole unit complies with IM for Off 
 > and Standby 
 > > mode.
 > > It is very challenge to this type of product as the 
 > battery pack may be
 > > charged up after the pc is turned off.  The power 
 > consumption would be the
 > > total of EPS, battery charger and notebook pc.
 > >
 > > Scott
 > >
 > > -----Original Message-----
 > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
 > Behalf Of Brian
 > > O'Connell
 > > Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 11:18 PM
 > > To: 'EMC PSTC'
 > > Subject: RE: EuP Directive Conundrum
 > >
 > > According to several NCB people, the off switch does not 
 > necessarily meet
 > > the requirements of off 'mode' limits. If the unit is not 
 > performing any
 > > function, then it must meet power consumption limits, or it must be
 > > automatically go into a reduced power mode that meets the 
 > off mode limit.
 > >
 > > The problem with the IM for an EPS is that it also includes battery
 > > chargers, where the power converter is integral - so the 
 > defining scope
 > > factor between the two IMs seems to be whether the unit 
 > meets Class B
 > > CISPR22 emission limits.
 > >
 > > Brian
 > >
 > > > -----Original Message-----
 > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of
 > > > Carpentier Kristiaan
 > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 7:17 AM
 > > > To: Scott Xe; Scott Douglas; EMC PSTC
 > > > Subject: RE: EuP Directive Conundrum
 > > >
 > > > Scott,
 > > >
 > > > Yes it is.
 > > > As you have the choice between off mode & standby, you can
 > > > consider to
 > > > equip a switch in your device.
 > > >
 > > > Kind regards,
 > > >
 > > > Kris Carpentier
 > > >
 > > > -----Original Message-----
 > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
 > > > Of Scott Xe
 > > > Sent: dinsdag 22 september 2009 16:09
 > > > To: 'Scott Douglas'; 'EMC PSTC'
 > > > Subject: RE: EuP Directive Conundrum
 > > >
 > > > >For example, I have a gadget that uses an EPS. The EPS by
 > > > itself when
 > > > >plugged into the mains and not connected to the product
 > > > consumes 0.4 W.
 > > >
 > > > >But when you connect the product to the EPS, the pair 
 > consume 1.1 W
 > > > when
 > > > >the gadget is in standby mode.
 > > >
 > > > Under this example, the EPS complies with EC Regulation
 > > > 278/2009 while
 > > > the
 > > > pair failed in EC Regulation 1275/2008 if the EPS is not a
 > > > Low Voltage
 > > > one
 > > > after 7 Jan 2010.  Is it an appropriate interpretation?
 > > >
 > > > Thanks and regards,
 > > >
 > > > Scott
 > >
 > > -
 > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
 > > This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering 
 > Society emc-pstc
 > > discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
 > > <[email protected]>
 > >
 > > All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
 > > http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
 > > Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be 
 > posted to that
 > > URL.
 > >
 > > Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
 > > Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
 > > List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
 > >
 > > For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 > > Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
 > > Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
 > >
 > > For policy questions, send mail to:
 > > Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
 > > David Heald: <[email protected]>
 > >
 > > -
 > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
 > > This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering 
 > Society emc-pstc 
 > > discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your 
 > e-mail to 
 > > <[email protected]>
 > >
 > > All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
 > > http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
 > > Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be 
 > posted to that 
 > > URL.
 > >
 > > Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
 > > Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
 > > List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
 > >
 > > For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 > > Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
 > > Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
 > >
 > > For policy questions, send mail to:
 > > Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
 > > David Heald: <[email protected]> 
 > 
 > -
 > ----------------------------------------------------------------
 > This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering 
 > Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the 
 > list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
 > 
 > All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
 > http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
 > Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be 
 > posted to that URL.
 > 
 > Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
 > Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
 > List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
 > 
 > For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 > Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
 > Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
 > 
 > For policy questions, send mail to:
 > Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
 > David Heald: <[email protected]>
 > 
 > 

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to