In message <[email protected]>, dated Mon, 21 Sep 2009, Scott Douglas <[email protected]> writes:
>Or, is there a remote possibility that if, I say IF, my EPS complies >with the regulation by itself with no gadget connected to it, Not only no-load: see below. > then I am done and do not need to worry about the combination of EPS >and gadget? Yes, you do not need to worry about exactly what happens with the actual gadget, because the EPS requirements cover both input power under no-load conditions and efficiency under four on-load conditions. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk Things can always get better. But that's not the only option. John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
