In message <0F877EFE518E4F1FBC7A7B42A7777829@MmPc21>, dated Mon, 21 Sep 
2009, Piotr Galka <[email protected]> writes:

>John,
>
>----- Original Message ----- From: "John Woodgate" 
><[email protected]>
>>
>> They are usually quite well shielded for electric fields, and the EMC 
>>standards are rather 'soft' on magnetic fields because they rarely 
>>cause  problems.
>
>It happened that each time the solenoid was de-energised, our 
>controller was reset and than energised it again - there were no way to 
>open the door. The reason was no diode installed at solenoid.

This is not a lack of 'EMC benignity' of the solenoid as a component. 
The Directive applies to the product that includes the solenoid. That 
has to meet electric field emission limits, which should protect your 
controller, IF its immunity is sufficient.
-- 
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
Things can always get better. But that's not the only option.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to