The radio man in Vietnam really hated taking a round in the battery pack since
it meant his arse usually got burnt before he could dump the pack. 

- Bill
Indecision may or may not be the problem.

--- On Wed, 8/5/09, Ken Javor <[email protected]> wrote:



        From: Ken Javor <[email protected]>
        Subject: Re: [PSES] Li-ion Question
        To: [email protected]
        Date: Wednesday, August 5, 2009, 1:00 PM
        
        
        Ditto that on all accounts - precisely the same experience, completely
        different battery.
        
        Ken Javor
        
        Phone: (256) 650-5261
        
        
        > From: "Price, Edward" <[email protected]
<http://us.mc396.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >
        > Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 09:45:14 -0700
        > To: <[email protected] <htt
://us.mc396.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >
        > Conversation: [PSES] Li-ion Question
        > Subject: RE: [PSES] Li-ion Question
        > 
        > A few years ago, my company bought smart Lithium batteries for a
        > man-worn electronics pack. These batteries were about 6" wide by 8" 
tall
        > by 2" thick. These batteries we so smart that they had a built-in
        > microprocessor in each battery. We found that the microprocessor
        > radiated from the internal battery leads. Further, the battery had to
        > withstand 50 V/M. The batteries failed spectacularly, showing strong
        > polarization effects caused by pickup of sensor leads buried in the
        > battery packs which transferred RF right into the microprocessors. 
For a
        > while, it was like testing fuses, as I destroyed 16 out of the first 
17
        > test samples.
        > 
        > So yes, I'll agree that the smart batteries can be a problem for both
        > radiated emission and immunity.
        > 
        > 
        > Ed Price
        > [email protected] <http://us.mc396.
ail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]>      WB6WSN
        > NARTE Certified EMC Engineer
        > Electromagnetic Compatibility Lab
        > Cubic Defense Applications
        > San Diego, CA  USA
        > 858-505-2780
        > Military & Avionics EMC Is Our Specialty
        >  
        > 
        >> -----Original Message-----
        >> From: [email protected] <http://us.
c396.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected] <http://us.mc
96.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> ] On Behalf
        >> Of Leber, Jody (San Diego)
        >> Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 9:25 AM
        >> To: [email protected] <http://us.mc3
6.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> ; [email protected]
<http://us.mc396.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> 
        >> Subject: RE: [PSES] Li-ion Question
        >> 
        >> Bob,
        >> 
        >> The CE marking would likely be based on the EMC directive
        >> since the circuitry may be sensitive to ESD.  The battery
        >> normally will be under the voltage limits of the LVD.  It is
        >> not uncommon in the industry to test the packs and cells to
        >> EN 62133 in addition to ESD and RF Immunity.
        >> If the battery is to be used in a medical application the end
        >> product vendor will probably request even more EMC/EMI tests.
        >> 
        >> Currently for an end product to receive a CB Scheme
        >> Certificate any batteries used must be tested to IEC 62133.
        >> 
        >> In my opinion, the cells alone should not be marked but
        >> batteries (cells with circuitry typically in an enclosure)
        >> usually will be, especially if they are serviceable by the operator.
        >> 
        >> Best Regards,
        >> 
        >> Jody Leber
        >> 
        >> SGS Consumer Testing Services
        >> 
        >> Manager, Battery Test Certification Program
        >> 
        >> 
        >> SGS - U. S. Testing Company, Inc.
        >> 
        >> 16870 West Bernardo Drive, Suite 250
        >> San Diego, CA 92127 USA
        >> 
        >> Phone: 678.469.9835
        >> Fax:     858.592.7107
        >> E-mail:  [email protected] <http:/
us.mc396.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> 
        >> 
        >>  
        >> 
        >> 
        >> -----Original Message-----
        >> From: Robert Heller [mailto:[email protected]
<http://us.mc396.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> ]
        >> Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 11:25 AM
        >> To: [email protected] <htt
://us.mc396.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> 
        >> Subject: [PSES] Li-ion Question
        >> 
        >> An off-the-wall question. It is my understanding that all
        >> Lithium Ion batteries (or other smart batteries) have digital
        >> circuitry in the for monitoring over-temp, etc during the
        >> recharging process. Do these batteries need to carry a CE
        >> marking because of this circuitry?
        >> 
        >> Bob Heller
        >> St. Paul, MN 55107-1208
        >> Tel:  651- 778-6336
        >> 
        >> -
        > 
        > -
        > ----------------------------------------------------------------
        > This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society 
emc-pstc
        > discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
        > <[email protected] <http://us.mc396.
ail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >
        > 
        > All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
        > http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
        > Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to 
that
URL.
        > 
        > Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
        > Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
        > List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
        > 
        > For help, send mail to the list administrators:
        > Scott Douglas <[email protected] 
http://us.mc396.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >
        > Mike Cantwell <[email protected] <h
tp://us.mc396.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >
        > 
        > For policy questions, send mail to:
        > Jim Bacher:  <[email protected] <htt
://us.mc396.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >
        > David Heald: <[email protected] <http
//us.mc396.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >
        
        -
        ----------------------------------------------------------------
        This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society 
emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected] <http://us.mc396.mai
.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >
        
        All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
        http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
        Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to 
that URL.
        
        Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
        Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
        List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
        
        For help, send mail to the list administrators:
        Scott Douglas <[email protected] <h
tp://us.mc396.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >
        Mike Cantwell <[email protected] <htt
://us.mc396.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >
        
        For policy questions, send mail to:
        Jim Bacher:  <[email protected] <http:
/us.mc396.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >
        David Heald: <[email protected] <http:/
us.mc396.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >
        


-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]> 


Reply via email to