Does anyone use absorbing cones on the groundplane for radiated emissions measurements above 1 GHz? CISPR 16-1-4, clause 8 states:
"The test site shall rely on reflection-free conditions. It may be necessary to use absorbing material and/or raise the height of the EUT to achieve these free-space conditions." CISPR 16-1-4 also talks about a FSOATS (free-space, open area test site) as a reference site. Is this a OATS without a ground plane? Or an OATS with absorbers? Or other? Bob Heller St. Paul, MN 55107-1208 Tel: 651- 778-6336 Fax: 651-778-6252 - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
