Even with shielded cables a test is still required in GR-1089.  It is
essentially a test of how well the shielding works.  The test is designed such
that if the shielding is not great at least part of the surge ends up on the
cable conductors.

 

I have found very few Ethernet ports on standard servers survive the surge
with unshielded cables.  Most Ethernet transceivers need to have some “above
and beyond” surge protection added in order to guarantee their survival.

 

Some customers I have dealt with do not allow the use of shielded cables on
Ethernet ports.  As with most things in NEBS it all comes down to the
customer’s requirements.

 

Dan

 

From: Joe Randolph [mailto:j...@randolph-telecom.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 9:33 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] GR-1089 intrabuilding surges question

 

On 6/1/2009, Gelfand, David wrote:




GR-1089 clause 4.6.9.2 intrabuilding surge test has an exemption for
shielded cables grounded at each end.  This is supported by Verizon
document http://www.verizonnebs.com/TPRs/VZ-TPR-9305.pdf clause
7.2.12.1.  

Does this reflect current practice?  



Hi David:

So far I have always managed to avoid using this exemption, since my gut feel
is that it might create more problems than it solves.  However, as the
requirements state, this is an allowable option for an installation with a CBN
grounding scheme.

These days most central offices use a CBN grounding scheme, but there may be
cases where an IBN system is still in place.  Technically, the exemption can
only be used in a CBN system, although this may be hard to control in practice.

I don't know what sort of intrabuilding cable you are addressing, but if it is
something as simple as an Ethernet cable, it should not be necessary to invoke
this exemption.





Joe Randolph
Telecom Design Consultant
Randolph Telecom, Inc.
781-721-2848 (USA)
j...@randolph-telecom.com
http://www.randolph-telecom.com <http://www.randolph-telecom.com/> 

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@ptcnh.net>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com> 

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@ptcnh.net>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com> 


Reply via email to