In message <[email protected]>, dated Thu, 14 May 2009, Scott Xe <[email protected]> writes:
>I am looking at some European legislations (LVD, EMC, etc) that require >CE Mark but some (RoHS, Packaging, REACH, etc.) do not. Is there any >reason behind to have such difference? The CE mark is to notify Customs and market surveillance officials that the product can cross national borders and be marketed in the EU. This is not relevant to RoHS, packaging, REACH, etc. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk Things can always get better. But that's not the only option. John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
