#define omnipitence
bool define_action(longint urgency){
int urgent = ( BossSaysNow() == YES )
if (urgent)
do_it(NOW)
return (TRUE)
else
do_it(PROCRASTINATE)
return (FALSE)
}
MISRA Violation Typecast
MISRA Violation Codepath
MISRA Violation type useage
MISRA Violation multiple path
MISRA Violation language scope
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Radojicic, Marko [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 3:01 PM
> To: Brian O'Connell; [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [PSES] RoHS version 2
>
> Brian,
>
> I'm not sure I understand your urgency in updating your
> DoCs. RoHS2 has not yet been adopted and I expect that,
> before that it is, at least your Issue #2 will have been resolved.
>
> Your supplier questionnaire will be interesting however
> particularly for the PCB fab vendors and anyone using PVC
> insulation! I wonder if anyone has seriously thought about
> the "socio-economic impacts" of the four additional substances.
>
> [FYI to the group - "Socio-economic impacts" is a new term
> in RoHS2 which is really unclear!]
>
> ...Marko
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian O'Connell [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 1:32 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [PSES] RoHS version 2
>
> Good People,
>
> The context of this subject is that I am writing a
> REACH/RoHS/etc questionnaire for my suppliers; and I am
> updating some of my Dec of Conformity and TCFs. I have noted
> that marking requirements specified in 768/2008/EC state:
>
> "The presumption of conformity to a legal provision
> conferred by conformity to a harmonised standard should
> enhance recourse to compliance with harmonised standards."
>
> and also says
>
> "The CE marking should be the only marking of conformity
> indicating that a product is in conformity with Community
> harmonisation legislation. However, other markings may be
> used as long as they contribute to the improvement of
> consumer protection and are not covered by Community
> harmonisation legislation."
>
>
> Issues/Questions
> 1. RoHS #2 is a CE-marking directive. Conformity assessment
> will be based on (as far as I can determine) non-existent standards.
> 2. Limits have yet to be established for the four additional
> substances.
> 3. Basis of additional marks that are required (WEEE, 'e', etc).
>
> Comments ? Advice ? Maniacal laughter ?
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
