In message <[email protected]>, Cortland Richmond <[email protected]> writes >The ultimate measure of a device is the device. Put a [mouse, for >example] on the table with cable running across the table then via >shielded means out the chamber to a data receiver. Rotate a disc under >the mouse and click with remotely controlled actuators to measure >emissions and determine susceptibility. > >Injecting RF could evaluate the efficiency with which emissions >generated by a host are radiated from the peripheral.. > >Knowing native emissions, and also losses in coupling emissions from a >host, one could select among different peripherals to assemble >compliant systems.
These methods may have merit but they are not those in international standards, specifically CISPR 22/EN 55022. -- This is my travelling signature, adding no superfluous mass. John M Woodgate - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
