In message <9d3c09c155d9904299b427d6d2b1bf9704061...@int-ev1.corpnet.intermec.com>, dated Fri, 10 Apr 2009, "Pickard, Ron" <[email protected]> writes:
>And, while we're on the subject of CISPR 22:2006 Section 7, in 7.2.1.2 >regarding ransom I think you meant 'random', but 'ransom retesting' sounds like it might be a lucrative pastime! >sampling/retesting, what is meant by "...from time to time..."? As this >is so nebulous, how can it be quantified, or can it? It's whatever the spectrum management authority in the country requires. Probably varies from 180 days to never. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk Things can always get better. But that's not the only option. John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
