In message <[email protected]>, dated Wed, 11 
Mar 2009, Bill Owsley <[email protected]> writes:

>Floating a scope is not just lifting the ground since the neutral (in 
>the USA) goes back to ground.  

But the neutral isn't connected to any signal circuits within the scope, 
so lifting the ground allows those circuits to be connected to a 'hot' 
reference point.

>Floating for me is using an isolation transformer - there is no 
>galvanic connection to the mains.  As you've mentioned - training as in 
>education.  And yes, there's some capacitive coupling that could make 
>touching some voltages somewhat uncomfortable but your back pockets 
>won't  explode in flames.

Isolation transformers create their own problems. There is a good reason 
why the neutral of public supplies is grounded, in all countries except 
where the surface of the planet is non-conducting rock (some parts of 
Norway and France, for example).

A safety Class 1 product has only basic insulation between mains and 
accessible parts. That is OK if there is a second safeguard - grounding 
the accessible parts. But if they are not grounded and the mains is 
floating, an insulation failure can persist undetected.
-- 
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
Things can always get better. But that's not the only option.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to