I did not check the latest version of this draft, but
if this is really written down it means that:

1 second in any 15 second period during 120 seconds.
that means 8 x 1 second peak over the limit  would pass.
That is a duty cycle of 12.5 %

I know a lot of equipment that will pass this way,
especially if no limit is given.

Basically this could imply that a set of 8 of these *not failing*
equipment could theoretically create a 100% of the time 
unlimited spectrum disturbance.

I do not think that  this could be the intention.


Regards,

Ing. Gert Gremmen

[email protected]
www.cetest.nl

Kiotoweg 363
3047 BG Rotterdam
T 31(0)104152426
F 31(0)104154953

 Before printing, think about the environment. 




Van: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Namens John Woodgate
Verzonden: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 7:46 PM
Aan: [email protected]
Onderwerp: Re: Brief and Isolated

In message 
<4c5e6457cd7911469a07260381288c282157e...@orsmsx502.amr.corp.intel.com>, 
dated Wed, 11 Feb 2009, "Pettit, Ghery" <[email protected]> writes:

>1.       The emission does not exceed the limit for more than 1 second, 
>and
>

One second??? That's an age these days. Especially if it's 120 dB above 
the limit.

>2.       The emission does not exceed the limit more than once in any 
>15 second observation period.?

That's probably reasonable. But I think that specific numbers are always 
going to be controversial. I'd prefer guidance in a Note, covering 
duration, average occurrence rate AND level.

Maybe the sum of 20*log(duration in seconds) and level above the limit 
in dB could be specified. Zero looks attractive for a guidance figure.
-- 
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
Things can always get better. But that's not the only option.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to