In message
<72b8947772cf0948adaa9853631663fb6473554...@pbi-namsg-02.mgdpbi.global.pv
t>, dated Fri, 16 Dec 2011, Jim Hulbert <[email protected]> writes:
As an easier option, I'm thinking of coming up with a relatively
light weight conductive surface that can be easily placed over the
floor tiles and easily removed again. Something like a foil that could
be rolled into place and then rolled up again when done
I can't think of a foil that would be mechanically robust enough. But a
wire mesh might be OK. The holes are much smaller than a wavelength, so
are 'invisible' to the radiation.
Screened cabins (in which we used to develop AM radios) used for the
walls 'perforated metal', which has typically 3 mm holes, but that is
much smaller than necessary.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
Some people who are peeling the finch of the financial crisis are thinking of
biting a rook.
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
