Are you measuring according to DA 00-705? That should help.

Bob Heller
3M EMC Laboratory, 76-1-01
St. Paul, MN 55107-1208
Tel: 651-778-6336
Fax: 651-778-6252
=================================




From:   "Pawson, James" <[email protected]>
To:     "'Grace Lin'" <[email protected]>
Cc:     "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date:   02/15/2012 07:03 AM
Subject:        RE: FCC - Intentional Radiators, Restricted Bands and 960 
MHz
Sent by:        [email protected]



Hi Grace,
 
That's a very useful document for measuring the RF path, thanks for the 
info. The issue we have is that the RF path is not the only path for the 
emissions at 960MHz from the equipment under test so measuring just the 
conducted output into the antenna would not give the whole picture.
 
Thanks
James

From: Grace Lin [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: 15 February 2012 12:42
To: Pawson, James
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: FCC - Intentional Radiators, Restricted Bands and 960 MHz

James,
 
FCC published a new DTS procedure, FCC KDB 558074 D01 DTS Meas Guidance 
v01 , on January 18, 2012.  If you are able to connect the antenna port of 
the device under test to the instrument (spectrum analyzer, through 
attenuators if needed), you may wish to use this procedure.  FCC has done 
a great job on this procedure (save engineers' time and have better 
repeatability).
 
If you need a sample test report using the FCC DTS procedure, DTS 
Measurement , published March 23, 2005, you may wish to look the report 
under FCC ID: EROCWD6660 or FCC ID: EROCWD6782.  These two applications 
were granted by the FCC.  Conducted measurement was used to take -20dBc 
data (screen captures).
 
With regards,
Grace Lin 
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 5:46 AM, Pawson, James <[email protected]> 
wrote:
 
Bit of a regulatory puzzler here, please bear with me.
 
Testing an intentional radiator to FCC 15.247. Spurious emissions allowed 
to be -20 dBc except in the 15.205 restricted bands where the general 
radiated emissions limits in 15.209.
 
Radiated emissions limits: 216 ~ 960 MHz = 200 uV/m, 960 MHz upwards = 500 
uV/m
The tighter (lower) limit applies at the band edges so at 960 MHz the 
limit is 200 uV/m
 
Restricted Bands includes 960 MHz to 1240 MHz
 
I've drawn a picture to help explain -- 
http://thedatastream.4hv.org/data/fcc_15-247_960mhz_limit_line_question.gif
 
 
My question is - what is the limit at 960 MHz for spurious emissions from 
an intentional radiator?
 
 
My interpretation (to the letter of part 15) is that for 960 MHz only, the 
limit is 200 uV/m. However this doesn't follow a common sense approach to 
the limits and restricted bands (the green limit line on the picture).
 
We currently have an issue with a product with emissions around 960 MHz 
that would cause it to fail the strict interpretation of the standard but 
pass the "common sense approach" interpretation. So any assistance is 
greatly appreciated :)
 
Thanks in advance
James
 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
James Pawson
Leading Hardware Engineer - EMC
EchoStar Europe
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
 
 
 
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to &LT;
[email protected]&GT;
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in 
well-used formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas &LT;[email protected]&GT;
Mike Cantwell &LT;[email protected]&GT; 
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher &LT;[email protected]&GT;
David Heald &LT;[email protected]&GT; 

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <
[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in 
well-used formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]> 

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to