In message
<[email protected]>, dated
Wed, 21 Mar 2012, Canio Dichirico <[email protected]> writes:
C.6) Honestly I ignore whether IEC and/or CENELEC are actually pursuing
what stated in the above-mentioned note of IEC 38, i.e., "after this
the reduction of this range [230/400 V ±10%] will be considered". Does
anybody know in this forum?
Standards bodies have no regulatory role. In Europe, the regulatory role
in this field rests with the European Commission and Parliament. In
other countries it rests, in most cases, with the national government.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
If 'QWERTY' is an English keyboard, what language is 'WYSIWYG' for?
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
