In message
<d250d01e39356a4e9cc3b4b459d665503ccdb...@ms-cda-01.advanced-input.com>,
dated Mon, 23 Apr 2012, "McInturff, Gary" <[email protected]>
writes:
I have a component we tested on the normal 55024 directed ESD table for
a table top mounted device. Worked fine, problem is that the customer
places this on a large metallic roll around pedestal on rubber wheels.
When they send it to a lab and test it this way there is a problem.
Why are they testing it that way? Products should be tested as the
standard specifies.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
Instead of saying that the government is doing too little, too late or too
much, too early, say they've got is exactly right, thus throwing them into
total confusion.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
