Hi Folks

 

My turn to ask a question!

 

At the moment I am engaged on a contract where the above may have a
significant impact!

 

So, can anyone provide/point to any comparisons between the 2nd & 3rd
editions of the standard?

(and yes, I already know about many of the significant additions to the
standard in Ed 3 in terms of the risk-assessment requirements  - which could
be quite significant in the current context, and of which I have done quite
a lot over the last few years)?

 

Any pointers would be most appreciated.

 

Many Thanks in advance.

 

John Allen

Compliance With Experience Ltd.

London, UK

 

From: John Allen [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: 17 May 2012 19:05
To: 'Charlie Blackham'; 'Peter Tarver'; '[email protected]'
Subject: RE: [PSES] Circuit breakers in Europe (Continuous vs.
Non-Continuous Loads)

 

Peter, Charlie 

 

Whilst Charlie's statement about European Harmonization of Wiring Rules is
true to an extent, (virtually?) all the national Wiring Rules/Regulations
are now based on the IEC 60364 model series of Wiring Rules, and - to an
extent (which I am sure someone can state more explicitly than I!) - the
concept of harmonizing them is laid out in CENELEC Harmonization Documents
in the HD384 series.

 

As such, (virtually, again?) all of the national Wiring Rules/Regulations
have the same basic documentation structures and contents along the lines of
the IEC 60364 sections - but traditional national differences in wiring
practices dictate that they don't always say exactly the same things.

 

Therefore what we have are national Wiring Rules like the USA ANSI/NFPA C1
"National Electrical Code" model code of practice and the various State/City
implementations into local laws and statutes - and in both the USA and
European cases, backed up and explained by detailed implementation Guides
prepared by the relevant official technical bodies responsible for drafting
the national documents.

 

In other words  (mine at least!) "almost but not quite" European
Harmonization" !!

 

PS: As indicated above, I am sure someone in Europe can come up with a more
detailed and erudite explanation of the situation.

 

John Allen

Compliance With Experience Ltd

London, UK

 

PPS: Now pretty much back in the Compliance job market doing various
contract assignments - and,  hopefully, I'll soon have an appropriate
website!

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Charlie
Blackham
Sent: 17 May 2012 08:45
To: Peter Tarver; [email protected]
Subject: RE: [PSES] Circuit breakers in Europe (Continuous vs.
Non-Continuous Loads)

 

Peter

 

AFAIK, European Wiring Regulations are not Harmonised, so there is no EU
equivalent of the NEC as each country has its own historical wiring and
wiring regulation.

 

Due to the current drawn, it sounds like the device is going to be Pluggable
Type B and/or wiring terminals for final connection to supply so I would add
a statement that "end installation must comply with local wiring
regulations" or similar.

 

Regards

Charlie

 

From: Peter Tarver [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: 16 May 2012 17:31
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PSES] Circuit breakers in Europe (Continuous vs.
Non-Continuous Loads)

 

Thank you all for your responses.

 

I'll clarify:

 

The current being carried is close to 16 A.  Wiring is appropriately sized
for this current and the length of the circuit conductors.  Should the
"branch circuit" overcurrent protection be rated anything other than 16A and
why?

 

Some have suggested 20 A is correct.

 

 

Regards,

 

Peter L. Tarver

 

 
 
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient, you may not review, use, copy, disclose or distribute
this message. If you received this message in error, please contact the
sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. 
 
 
-
 
 
----------------------------------------------------------------
 
 

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

 
 

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

 
 

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in
well-used formats), large files, etc.

 
 
 

Website:      http://www.ieee-pses.org/

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules:     http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

Scott Douglas <[email protected]>

Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

 

For policy questions, send mail to:

Jim Bacher  <[email protected]>

David Heald <[email protected]>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in
well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]> 


-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to