In message <[email protected]>, dated Thu, 29
Nov 2012, Mark Gandler <[email protected]> writes:
All text coming after it is the condition, and that INCLUDES the
testing. See last sentence: “The efficiency of the various sharing
mechanisms can be assessed using the appropriate clauses of EN 300 328
version 1.8.1.”
Mark Gandler: I still believe the word CAN is a key in
this discussion, am trying to get final feedback from OJ on the word
"can"
Not only that, can a NOTE in an ETSI standard include a requirement? It
cannot in IEC and CENELEC standards.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
The longer it takes to make a point, the more obtuse it proves to be.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
