In message
<617eb8c8634c9149aa66c853d7b8ac53b...@by2prd0310mb389.namprd03.prod.outlo
ok.com>, dated Wed, 9 Jan 2013, "Crane, Lauren"
<[email protected]> writes:
Does anyone reading have any additional perspective on this battle?
Will a ?model line? DoC be possible in the future?
Things like this tend to be modified as the consultation and other
processes progress. It relay depends on how strongly such proposals are
challenged by European and international trade associations.
One obvious question in 'cui bono?' - for whom is such a requirement a
benefit? Since the general public mostly throws away the instruction
book of each product (and doesn't know what a DoC is, anyway), the DoC
will go with it. Market surveillance bodies seem unlikely to unbox every
product in a shipment to check the number on its DoC with its serial
number. A non-compliant product remains non-compliant however many
pieces of paper carry its serial number.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
The longer it takes to make a point, the more obtuse it proves to be.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
