In message <037101cdf9b6$b1ecc260$15c64720$@richardson>, dated Thu, 24
Jan 2013, Kevin Richardson <[email protected]> writes:
The regulations require portable intentional emitters (e.g. mobile
phones etc) comply with the ARPANSA standard.
CISPR 22 is an EMC standard and not used in relation to EMR (exposure
to RF) requirements in Australia.
But the OP's product is a non-intentional emitter, so in fact the spec
is wrong in requiring ARPANSA compliance. It's a very common error on
the part of over-enthusiastic and poorly-trained spec writers. We used
to get specs requiring products to 'comply with all British Standards' -
note the totally unqualified 'all'.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
The longer it takes to make a point, the more obtuse it proves to be.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
