In message
<d3c1894bfa9de04cb51e30ee2a87b73a28147...@bn1prd0612mb636.namprd06.prod.o
utlook.com>, dated Thu, 11 Jul 2013, Luke Turnbull
<[email protected]> writes:
Do system suppliers generally re-test for EMC when components become
obsolescent?
Of course. (;-)
Do system suppliers generally re-test periodically in case components
have been unknowingly changed, or in case production processes have
been changed without considering their effect on EMC compliance?
Extremely diligently. (;-)
Seriously, whoever is responsible for compliance; that better be the
Technical Director, not the tame EMC expert, who doesn't have enough
clout to prevent changes being 'forgotten' or not documented and acted
on.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Why is the stapler always empty just when you want it?
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
